So is it just me or does getting 2 scientists/city up and running as fast as possible work better than going Colosseum first?
Now technically that Colosseum is +4 science and more importantly another city square for awesomeness, but I've found that my science takes off at a far faster rate (And I get tons more scientists) if my new cities go library->2 scientists->everything else.
I have fewer cities and less production, so one would assume that at some point there will be a trade off where having gone Colosseum first would beat out this approach, but to me that is massively mitigated by the much faster earlier tech rate, faster FP, and most important of all, faster secularism+freedom, lately I've gone to not even bothering with liberty and just saving up for those three.
Basically I Rex as far as I can on luxuries alone while building libraries and powerbulbing to either astronomy or banking depending on how much room there is.
So...thoughts? A quantitative comparison from someone who has something more than WAGs to back themselves?
Now technically that Colosseum is +4 science and more importantly another city square for awesomeness, but I've found that my science takes off at a far faster rate (And I get tons more scientists) if my new cities go library->2 scientists->everything else.
I have fewer cities and less production, so one would assume that at some point there will be a trade off where having gone Colosseum first would beat out this approach, but to me that is massively mitigated by the much faster earlier tech rate, faster FP, and most important of all, faster secularism+freedom, lately I've gone to not even bothering with liberty and just saving up for those three.
Basically I Rex as far as I can on luxuries alone while building libraries and powerbulbing to either astronomy or banking depending on how much room there is.
So...thoughts? A quantitative comparison from someone who has something more than WAGs to back themselves?