sonicmyst
Emperor
There's new games that will be announced later this year:
https://www.pcgamesn.com/civilization-vi/firaxis-new-game-2021
https://www.pcgamesn.com/civilization-vi/firaxis-new-game-2021
Apparently Firaxis has several games in development, so we may get a fantasy and sci-fi Civ.
Civilization devs have “several” games in development that will be revealed “this year” | PCGamesN
"We expect this growth to continue as the studio has several exciting projects in development that will be revealed this year" - Strauss Zelnick, CEO Take Two.
- Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) Q4 2021 Earnings Call Transcript | The Motley Fool
Beyond Earth was so unpopular I don't think they'll be eager to try that again. I wouldn't rule out a spinoff, but I think Civ7 is much more likely (and, in my opinion, desirable).In all honesty it's probably some kind of fantasy or sci-fi spin off in this case.
Beyond Earth was so unpopular I don't think they'll be eager to try that again. I wouldn't rule out a spinoff, but I think Civ7 is much more likely (and, in my opinion, desirable).
I mean, it's not smart business to try to release a sequel to a product that was unpopular in the first place. Like I said, I'm not ruling out a spinoff, but I don't think it makes good business sense. Civ7 will undoubtedly sell better than any spinoff, and the market is clearly hot for historical 4X games. If there's a spinoff, I think something either mythology or age-specific is much more likely than a sci-fi or fantasy game.Just because BE did not do well, doesn't mean that Firaxis won't try again to do a scifi spin-off, especially if they have some cool scifi concepts that they want to try out with the civ6 game engine.
As someone whose obsession with Tolkien borders on veneration, I have to point out that that's not Lord of the Rings style.Think Lord of the Rings style 4X with armies of orcs or dragons.
I do agree that it does seem a little bit too early to announce Civ VII just months after the NFP ended. If it's not a second season, I think chances are it's a spin-off.I mean, it's not smart business to try to release a sequel to a product that was unpopular in the first place. Like I said, I'm not ruling out a spinoff, but I don't think it makes good business sense. Civ7 will undoubtedly sell better than any spinoff, and the market is clearly hot for historical 4X games. If there's a spinoff, I think something either mythology or age-specific is much more likely than a sci-fi or fantasy game.
There are people who still play Beyond Earth regularlyBeyond Earth was so unpopular I don't think they'll be eager to try that again. I wouldn't rule out a spinoff, but I think Civ7 is much more likely (and, in my opinion, desirable).
I don't see Civ7 being announced next month, but I could see it being announced in the next year or so. It's been obvious that the main development team moved on from Civ6 quite a while ago.I do agree that it does seem a little bit too early to announce Civ VII just months after the NFP ended. If it's not a second season, I think chances are it's a spin-off.
But I do agree with you that it might not be sci-fi, but more historical, maybe with fantasy elements like mythology, similar to how Heroes and Legends game mode worked.
There are people who like most things, but that's not really relevant to the point that it was poorly received. It may or may not have turned a profit (I'm certainly not privy to FXS' fiscal situation), but I highly doubt it was as profitable as Civ5 or Civ6. Even profitable things can be a disappointment to their parent company if they don't generate enough profit. Also critical reception is relevant because the people who bought Beyond Earth and found it lacking are a lot less likely to buy another original spinoff from FXS. I wouldn't touch a spinoff set in an original setting by FXS until I knew for certain it wasn't as soulless as Beyond Earth (a game that had a great deal of potential and squandered it thanks to subpar writing).There are people who still play Beyond Earth regularly
(It is a much better game than Civ V for multiplayer).
Success is measured in terms of $$ revenue not critical acclaim. And Beyond Earth cost around twice as much as Civ V, if I recall correctly.
So I'm guessing it didn't do too badly for Firaxis and 2K.
You'll have to talk to EA about that one and can no doubt look forward to a "live service" model if they agree to let it happen. "Purchase a Settler for $5.00!"Or better yet, SMAC/X 2!
Tell that to Amazon...As someone whose obsession with Tolkien borders on veneration, I have to point out that that's not Lord of the Rings style.
Every sci-fi and fantasy game needs a good story. SMAC had one. BE didn't.
Every sci-fi and fantasy game needs a good story. SMAC had one. BE didn't. I'm not sure FXS as a company is capable of fitting it into its budget or even mentality.
Calling it: Amazon is making off-brand Game of Thrones, just like their attempt at Tales from the Loop (a wonderful narrative art book and pen-and-paper RPG) turned into off-brand Stranger Things.Tell that to Amazon...
Like Amazon's Lord of the Rings series coming out soon?Calling it: Amazon is making off-brand Game of Thrones, just like their attempt at Tales from the Loop (a wonderful narrative art book and pen-and-paper RPG) turned into off-brand Stranger Things.
That's what I was talking about: their ostensibly Lord of the Rings show is just going to be off-brand Game of Thrones, and I hate it already. Amazon should really stick to selling other peoples' things...Like Amazon's Lord of the Rings series coming out soon?