Sorry for the late reply. I meant without World Wonders and only including Natural Wonders and City States. I'm curious about how it'll appear on a TSL map.
The Americas and Africa stand out on the map as the largest areas with the fewest civ representatives. Hopefully each of them gets at least one representative in Rise and Fall.
The Americas and Africa stand out on the map as the largest areas with the fewest civ representatives. Hopefully each of them gets at least one representative in Rise and Fall.
We have five civs left unannounced: I hope there’s at least 1 South American (Inca!), 1 (native) North American, and 1 African. Then it’s quite likely we’ll get another European Civ and one from the Middle East (hopefully Ottomans). East Asia has had a pretty good run with Korea and Mongolia following Khmer and Indonesia.
We have five civs left unannounced: I hope there’s at least 1 South American (Inca!), 1 (native) North American, and 1 African. Then it’s quite likely we’ll get another European Civ and one from the Middle East (hopefully Ottomans). East Asia has had a pretty good run with Korea and Mongolia following Khmer and Indonesia.
Furthermore, the Byzantines are a series regular as well. And since the Ottomans and Byzantines are unlikely to appear in the same expansion, we will almost certainly be getting one of them. At the moment the Ottomans look like the more likely.
Furthermore, the Byzantines are a series regular as well. And since the Ottomans and Byzantines are unlikely to appear in the same expansion, we will almost certainly be getting one of them. At the moment the Ottomans look like the more likely.
Indeed there are two big holes in the Rome Map, one area around the Byzantium/Ottoman Empire, and the other around Carthage, and I'm confident that we will get at least one of them this time around
Indeed there are two big holes in the Rome Map, one area around the Byzantium/Ottoman Empire, and the other around Carthage, and I'm confident that we will get at least one of them this time around
As likely as a Celtic civ is, I don't think England's city list has anything to do with that. IIRC England has always largely stuck to English cities even if it's conflated with the GB/UK to some degree. Civ III and IV's Celtic city list was largely Gaulish with some insular areas, so the exclusion of Edinburgh or Cardiff from the English map probably has more to do with these not being in England than any planned Celtic civ.
As likely as a Celtic civ is, I don't think England's city list has anything to do with that. IIRC England has always largely stuck to English cities even if it's conflated with the GB/UK to some degree. Civ III and IV's Celtic city list was largely Gaulish with some insular areas, so the exclusion of Edinburgh or Cardiff from the English map probably has more to do with these not being in England than any planned Celtic civ.
For the Cree map it will largely depend on how the Cree are represented as they are split into several groups. The Iron Confederacy seems to be the most likely to be represented so I would wait until the full City-List comes out before any work is done on the map.
For the Cree map it will largely depend on how the Cree are represented as they are split into several groups. The Iron Confederacy seems to be the most likely to be represented so I would wait until the full City-List comes out before any work is done on the map.
No from what I can see formally the Cree didn't have any major territory at the end of Poundmaker's time, so that is one of the rules I broke, from what I have read (and feel free to corect me if this is wrong) is that he came from the Plains Cree nations, so I used that as my barometer
No from what I can see formally the Cree didn't have any major territory at the end of Poundmaker's time, so that is one of the rules I broke, from what I have read (and feel free to corect me if this is wrong) is that he came from the Plains Cree nations, so I used that as my barometer
I think technically we could examine treaties between the British/Canadians and the Iron Confederacy. While we can question the legitimacy of some treaties or wonder if legal and effective control are different, it's at least a starting point. Here is the Treaty 6 that Poundmaker helped negotiate:
It's certainly possible I'm misreading the map, but I think this is what it conveys. The territory being negotiated by the First Nations' Federation is marked Treaty 6. In exchange for schools and medicine, the Federation would cede sovereignty to the Queen. The Canadian government would reserve land, that is unfortunately not marked. The "Medicine Chest" clause is a big deal because it was interpreted differently by both sides. The First Nations believed it meant the Canadian government would provide healthcare in perpetuity because the introduction of Small Pox to the area was a major reason they signed the treaty.
I would mark the Iron Confederacy territory as all of Treaty 6, though it's up for interpretation. One could limit the Cree to just the reservations (which I frustratingly can't find) or argue that losing sovereignty in the treaty means they cease to exist as holding territory. I personally chose to mark it as the Treaty 6 boundaries. This also seems to fit where the theater of operations was during the North-West Rebellion (which seems to have a problematic name, but whatever).
Here is another map of the Cree for that time period that places them a bit farther south during the North-West Rebellion. There are no borders in this one, unfortunately. At first I thought the rivers were borders, but that was just wishful thinking on my part.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.