Meow meow found to not be linked to teen deaths

Truronian

Quite unfamiliar
Retired Moderator
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
9,869
Location
Near Cornwall
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/may/28/mephedrone-cleared-teenage-uk-deaths

Toxicology tests have reportedly found that two teenagers who were thought to have died as a result of taking mephedrone – leading to a successful campaign to ban it – had not taken the drug.

The deaths in March of Louis Wainwright, 18, and Nicholas Smith, 19, contributed to a furore over mephedrone, which was at the time legal and being sold over the internet.

...

I feel sorry for the gardeners who can no longer use it as plant food...
 
lolzers!
 
Since when has the health effects of drug use had anything to do with whether they are deemed legal or not? :confused:

:mischief:
 
Am I missing something here?

They ate fertilizer, which killed them, and so the fertilizer was banned? Can you not wash your floors with bleach either?
 
1 - they didnt eat it.

2 - Its a variation on MDMA changed just enough to make it a legal substance. Not legal to sell as a drug obviously, hence being sold as something else.

Basically this was a text-book moral panic. They just ticked Cohen's tickboxes one by one.
 
So what did they do? It said they died as a result of taking it, "which prior to the ban was marketed as plant food with names such as Bubbles and M-Cat".

Was it not even supposed to be used as plant food?
 
So what did they do? It said they died as a result of taking it, "which prior to the ban was marketed as plant food with names such as Bubbles and M-Cat".

Was it not even supposed to be used as plant food?

1 - Tox screen has demonstrated they did not take it.

2 - No it was never supposed to be used as plant/ fish food.

MDMA is illegial. Even a slight change in the structure of a designer drug means it is no longer the same chemical that has been proscribed. Therefore some bright spark made a new variation to MDMA that was not illegial.

Since the new chemical had not been approved for sale as a drug it could not legally be marketed as such. Fish/ plant food does not need approval. Thus the MDMA-like chemical could legally be sold as plant food. That does not make it plant food.
 
Does anyone know the price chance since the ban?
 
I didn't actually realise that it wasn't actually plant food... :lol: That'll teach me to read the tabloids at work. In that case surely selling it as plant food would have been a violation of the Trade Descriptions Act?
 
Well, in theory you could use it as plant food.. doesn't mean it will do anything for the plant!
 
If it doesn't provide nutrients to the plant then it's not really food. If I swallow a penny that's not food either.
 
Well, it does provide nutrients, just not any really needed by the plant.

You could say the same about a lot of dietary supplements. We eat them, but they are not actually any use to our bodies.
 
Well, it does provide nutrients, just not any really needed by the plant.

You could say the same about a lot of dietary supplements. We eat them, but they are not actually any use to our bodies.

And they're not marketed as food either. I very much doubt meow meow would have been legal to sell as plant food without actually fulfilling the role that plant food is meant to.

EDIT: I've looked it up; it seems that it was hypothesised that it might be illegal to sell as plant food, but the government banned it before any such case actually was formed.
 
Please stop calling it "meow meow". It's a name that's never been used except by he Sun and other tabloids.
 
..it was in Brighton.
 
Back
Top Bottom