U
Ubik01
Guest
To dear Lord Owen
I really don't know if you like to play with words or are unable of extending your thought model to include - let's say the next block of thoughts?
If this seems to "deep" for you, let's try this: "Racist" is a word we use for those who are separating people according to their race, yes. But nowadays, the word has a more extended meaning: If you think of people as "straight" and "gay" you are also racist. If you think of people as "catholics" and "protestants", that also falls under the definition of "racism". Also, if you think of people as "muslim" and "christians".
I think you are the victim of bad propaganda, my friend. Just tell me which muslim country is "aggresive" nowadays? And don't start that Iraqi crap, because we all know who brought up (and still keeps in place - as they couldn't "remove" the sob one way or another) Sadam.
Is Saudi Arabia aggresive? Is Egypt? Is UAE? Is Iran? Where is that militaristic/aggresive muslim state? Well, ok, Algeria is not excactly a paradigm of Democracy and so is Turkey... but again how many "christian" countries are dictatorships or "democracy" only by name? Many, huh?
Don't mix apples with berries, will ya? The problem in the middle East is definitely as complex as it can be, and it mainly is so because of Israeli aggresivity, not of Palestinian.
And I wouldn't agree to those who say "hey, they kill eachother for 3000 years there, why stop now". That is nonsense, up to the end of the second world war Europe was constantly in turbulance and war for more than 3000 years - should we carry on with this?
I don't believe you would answer "yes" to the above question, so the answer to the other - most important - question about Israel and Palestine is not hard to get.
The solution? If you ask me, it's simple: Convince your government (and I am talking to all US citizens here) to stop the generous aid to Israel. In a two year time (maybe less) they'll have to find a viable solution for both communities.
I really don't know if you like to play with words or are unable of extending your thought model to include - let's say the next block of thoughts?
If this seems to "deep" for you, let's try this: "Racist" is a word we use for those who are separating people according to their race, yes. But nowadays, the word has a more extended meaning: If you think of people as "straight" and "gay" you are also racist. If you think of people as "catholics" and "protestants", that also falls under the definition of "racism". Also, if you think of people as "muslim" and "christians".
I think you are the victim of bad propaganda, my friend. Just tell me which muslim country is "aggresive" nowadays? And don't start that Iraqi crap, because we all know who brought up (and still keeps in place - as they couldn't "remove" the sob one way or another) Sadam.
Is Saudi Arabia aggresive? Is Egypt? Is UAE? Is Iran? Where is that militaristic/aggresive muslim state? Well, ok, Algeria is not excactly a paradigm of Democracy and so is Turkey... but again how many "christian" countries are dictatorships or "democracy" only by name? Many, huh?
Don't mix apples with berries, will ya? The problem in the middle East is definitely as complex as it can be, and it mainly is so because of Israeli aggresivity, not of Palestinian.
And I wouldn't agree to those who say "hey, they kill eachother for 3000 years there, why stop now". That is nonsense, up to the end of the second world war Europe was constantly in turbulance and war for more than 3000 years - should we carry on with this?
I don't believe you would answer "yes" to the above question, so the answer to the other - most important - question about Israel and Palestine is not hard to get.
The solution? If you ask me, it's simple: Convince your government (and I am talking to all US citizens here) to stop the generous aid to Israel. In a two year time (maybe less) they'll have to find a viable solution for both communities.