1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Most useless unit?

Discussion in 'Civ4 - Strategy & Tips' started by blaugh, Aug 16, 2006.

  1. PugFugly

    PugFugly Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2005
    Messages:
    40
    Scouts do that job just as well, and they are cheaper.
     
  2. Pantastic

    Pantastic King

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    Messages:
    922
    As I pointed out before, 2 2/3 scouts do the job of medic better than 1 explorer. "2 moves on any terrain" doesn't do much good for a medic unit, since medics are generally following other units that don't get 2 moves on all terrain.
     
  3. Hey Joni

    Hey Joni Warlord

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    111
    Location:
    Most probably - at work
    Convinced? If not, read all the other arguments in this thread!
     
  4. cabert

    cabert Big mouth

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,710
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    France
    what about scouts? (2 moves on any terrain? are you drunk? you start with guerilla I and woodsman I AFAIK, you need 5 XP to have the woodsman II and guerilla II)

    edit : too slow :lol:
     
  5. csarmi

    csarmi Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    73
    You don't need guerilla or woodsman for explorers, they already treat any terrain the same way. And fast movement for medics in enemy terrain is just about the best you can wish for.
     
  6. augustuscaesar9

    augustuscaesar9 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    8
    The warrior. The most useless unit ever because you usually get bronzeworking in the very beginning of the game, which lets you have spearmen. Also the musketeer.
     
  7. Pantastic

    Pantastic King

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    Messages:
    922
    Why? Seriously, I can't think of any time when I thought 'if only my medic could move 2 on hills or forests!', very minor planning (have a medic or two start off with each stack) means that you won't end up with a medic on the other side of hills/forest from a cluster of damaged units. Plus if you didn't have explorers, you'd have 2 2/3 scouts medics per explorer medic - easily enough to put 2 in every stack and have some left over.
     
  8. aelf

    aelf Ashen One

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,009
    Location:
    Tir ná Lia
    Your statement is very unenlightened. Care to give details on why you have such opinions? What difficulty level are you playing on such that you can survive the early game without warriors? And the Musketeer is definitely not the least useful unit if you are worth a pinch of salt playing France.
     
  9. CivDude86

    CivDude86 King

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    862
    How can people say warriors are useless? They must play with no barbarians or go into world builder and place copper in their capital. They're usually they first thing I build if I don't have hunting or a resource to improve.
     
  10. csarmi

    csarmi Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    73
    yea and on those - of course - very rare occasions they save you... flexibility is always nice to have
     
  11. Gumbolt

    Gumbolt Phoenix Rising

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    23,353
    Location:
    UK
    Wouldnt say the warrior is useless. A good cheap fog buster. Stops a rush by the inca. Cheap to explore with early game. Wouldnt say spearmen were a great defending unit although as part of a larger defense maybe. Certainly with the chariots now +100% against axemen you'll need a spearman or 2 but i'll stick with axemen as my main unit to build with swordsmen closely after to stop those pesky chariots in there steps.
     
  12. Gogf

    Gogf Indescribable

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2003
    Messages:
    10,163
    Location:
    Plane Of Fish Sticks
    Anyone who says explorers are the most useless unit in the game has obviously never played a medieval or renaissance multiplayer game.
     
  13. aelf

    aelf Ashen One

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,009
    Location:
    Tir ná Lia
    Yup, I haven't. But in what exact ways are they useful in those games?
     
  14. Gogf

    Gogf Indescribable

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2003
    Messages:
    10,163
    Location:
    Plane Of Fish Sticks
    They're useful in a few ways. Most obviously is exploring; they're not hindered by terrain and they're a cheap two move unit. If you're playing with barbarians, they're much more proficient at dispatching them than regular scouts.

    In fact, they're extremely hard to kill with anything available at the start of a medieval or renaissance game, if placed on defensive terrain. Put one of those on a forest or forest hill in front of someone's city and you'll likely be able to hold it long enough to get an even stronger unit on there. They're good for skirting around your opponent's civ to see where their units and cities are, and for cutting roads early on when you intend to attack one city and your opponent only has one road between his two.
     
  15. csarmi

    csarmi Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    73
    Actually in my xurrent game I think I'll be using them as stack-defenders. I don't have longbows and these things have good defense.
     
  16. Rheinmetall

    Rheinmetall Interplanetary Assassin

    Joined:
    May 10, 2002
    Messages:
    2,165
    Location:
    Villore
    Ironclads are NOT useless. I was playing with my friend against multiple computer opponents. The map had two oil resources and we had neither of them. Ironclads became our only way of stopping Catherine's destroyers before we could launch assault on her continent. My friend had to sacrifice one third of his navy to kill a russian battleship(he launched a multitude of Ironclads, frigates and galleons against it). We did manage to win the game eventually. Ironclads are the best you got without oil.
     
  17. wioneo

    wioneo King

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    752
    Late in the game, your only enemies should be far away. The only way that I could see to use planes would be from an airport colony, or a parked carrier. Both of those, I would assume, are hard to utilize. I try to end the game militarily, or be peacefully building up culture(which I do very slowly) at that point in the game.
     
  18. Stormfalcon1970

    Stormfalcon1970 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2004
    Messages:
    59
    Location:
    Phoenix , AZ



    Never thought of that. They (scouts/explorers) also make handy escorts for stacks of workers. When moving a stack over to a choice piece of real estate, 9 times out of ten even if the workers are out of movement points the scout/explorer isn't. Simply give the scout/explorer the work command and the stack will start working next turn without further orders. Scouts are ok for protecting your workers against barbarians until you can free up a warrior or other unit, to use as 'markers' for good city locations and/or to escort your settlers to that location. In this way, I've ended many a game with at least 4 or 5 seasoned explorers in my employ.

    Parking ironclads on your valuable sea resources discourages piracy nicely.

    I wasn't too happy with the Celtic UU. I'll have to try them again.



    "Kaylee! Find that boy that's taking a dirtnap with baby Jesus!
    We need a hood ornament....and Jayne, try not to steal too much of their ****!!!

    - Serenity Outtakes -
     
  19. Haethcyn

    Haethcyn Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6
    My pick is the ironclad. They're not quite versatile enough. You really have to dig to find a reason to favor them. They do look cool, though. They're kinda like the Jaguars of the seas.
     
  20. FunkyMonkee

    FunkyMonkee Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2006
    Messages:
    28
    I was about to jump on the dump the warrior bandwagon then I recalled the countless times they have either saved by butt or help create a early attack/choke force. This is done by upgrading them to spear and axemen. They are lot cheaper then axemen or spearmen to produce. The downside is the cost to upgrade. With tribual villages you can usual collect enough cash to upgrade 2-4 warriors fairly easily. If playing without tribual villages about 1-2 warriors can be upgraded easily by reducing research rate temporary in a crunch. Small window but can give that early advantage for the all important start.

    Quite often I will produce warriors with the aim to upgrading to either spear or axemen early in the game if I get some cash. Having 2-4 warriors early in the game to upgrade as soon as you can connect either bronze or iron can turn a game. Have them positioned at the front of you culture boarders as you connect your metal resource and they have a running head start to your enemies cities.

    As for explorers I rarely bother with producing them from ancient starts. They can be useful as medics. For some later era starts early on they can be useful to block workers from connecting up resources or set up sentry posts on forest hills.

    I would vote for the Aztec Jaguar if unique units are also allowed for the most useless unit. They are are weakened swordmen that have defence bonus in jungle that doesnt require a resource. Very situatioal and very weak unit for the cost. Infact the explorer almost matches it against Jaguar for cost/strength and has more mobility.

    By the time I've researched Iron Working I'll usualy have produced a settler to dash for the nearest metal if I didnt acquire bronze working. In a crunch I may place the settler directly on the resource and upgrade those "useless warriors" ASAP.


    Cheers,

    FunkyMonkee:crazyeye:
     

Share This Page