Ireland and Scotland should join at some point
(Brian Boru as a leader please)
Or maybe modern as well? I mean, Nepal is in the Modern Era, with units that fought the British Empire. Civ is thematically "revolutionary", especially this one, with lots of "revolutionary" "leaders". So, Ireland could fit perfectly for their fight for independence.Ireland can work thematically, since some of the civs are anachronistic to the ages they're at (like Khmer). I can see Ireland working for the entire Exploration Age especially if their design leans a lot towards religion.
or CiliciaSome people have, it could be an antiquity predecessor to Georgia
Cilicia is much, much better and the most logical pathwayor Cilicia
Exploration Age covers the Medieval period, so Exploration Ireland fits fine. I think it is a better fit than putting them in Modern because they were essentially under the United Kingdom for most of that time period.Ireland is a strange case. It really should be early medieval but Civ7 really doesn't cover that time period.
they are far too closely associated with that bland, sterilized white color.
That was February 16th me's attempt at communicating my general apathy towards the public conception of Greek culture in terms of its adaption and idolization by the renaissance, unpainted statues and pillars from antiquity that would become the image of "sophistication," compared to my personal experiences with the medieval, Orthodox culture: murals, mosaics and the smell of candles and incense, sometimes desaturated, but only in the way that wine may taste "dry," definitely not sterile and very very personal. Alexander, as a figure who has been in the public perception for so song, is inexorably tied up with that public perception of what "Greek" means, and thus strays too far from what I want out of an Eastern European leader: the ability to represent Orthodoxy. Pericles has a similar fate: he is the Athenian democrat, the forerunner of later democracies, existing as a character mostly in terms of what him and his ideals mean to the nations to the west. I want someone from after the adoption of Christianity by the east, someone who can truly be present in the game as a representative of the culture I associate myself with, not as a figure adopted by someone else. This is all personal and vibes-based, which is probably why it may come across as nonsense.what do you mean
That was February 16th me's attempt at communicating my general apathy towards the public conception of Greek culture in terms of its adaption and idolization by the renaissance, unpainted statues and pillars from antiquity that would become the image of "sophistication," compared to my personal experiences with the medieval, Orthodox culture: murals, mosaics and the smell of candles and incense, sometimes desaturated, but only in the way that wine may taste "dry," definitely not sterile and very very personal. Alexander, as a figure who has been in the public perception for so song, is inexorably tied up with that public perception of what "Greek" means, and thus strays too far from what I want out of an Eastern European leader: the ability to represent Orthodoxy. Pericles has a similar fate: he is the Athenian democrat, the forerunner of later democracies, existing as a character mostly in terms of what him and his ideals mean to the nations to the west. I want someone from after the adoption of Christianity by the east, someone who can truly be present in the game as a representative of the culture I associate myself with, not as a figure adopted by someone else. This is all personal and vibes-based, which is probably why it may come across as nonsense.