Blockinlick
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2011
- Messages
- 42
So I decided to install this game again recently and I've gotten the hang of managing my workers right again [Like I used to], but I've forgotten how I should go about managing my Civilians/Specialists.
Anyways, the last few days I've been trying to work on and streamline an Axe-Rush strategy on Warlord and, pathetically, I'm having trouble making it work.
Chosen Map/Scenario Don't read this until you've read the rest.
My first attempt today, I was confident that I had strong strategy. I failed miserably simply because Alexander beat me to the Copper, which delayed my Rush until 90 BC [Far too late]. I also had trouble getting my middle city to work fast [It was always taking 30 turns minimum to get just anything done]. They kept getting crowded. Is this because I built too many cottages? It has no water nearby or any hills, so I can't build a farm or Mine either.
At about 3000 BC, I had raised and army of 10 Warriors and declared war on Alex. I stole his city on the Copper and made peace about 20 turns later. It wasn't until 90 BC that I had built up an army of 12 Axemen + 7 Warriors [I divided into 2 groups]. I declared war on Alex again and it was barely enough to take two of his cities and have a couple units to protect each city and 5 units left over to keep marauding. The remaining 5 units [2 Axe, 3 Warrior] got wiped out in the next attack on his other city [To my surprise].
I exited the game without saving because I looked at the year and it said 500 AD and I saw that Roosevelt was trailing me in Techs already. By the time I would take out Gandhi and Nappy, He would have had Muskets lol.
Should I shoot to rush Roosevelt first, then go for Alex? Roosevelt is quite a ways away though.
I'm also wondering if grabbing the Copper first would have failed anyways. Roosevelt is dominant so fast, and Alex is spamming cities in my way like a pest.
Anyways, the last few days I've been trying to work on and streamline an Axe-Rush strategy on Warlord and, pathetically, I'm having trouble making it work.
Chosen Map/Scenario Don't read this until you've read the rest.
Spoiler :
First off, let me say that I've chosen this scenario because I believe it's what will be the most fun and I believe that if I succeed an Axe-Rush win before 500 AD [Or before Axemen become far obsolete] on it, then I've learned what I want to learn.
I'm using a simple custom scenario to test it.
-Time is Marathon [I like Marathon and Epic because I don't like that Axemen get obsolete so fast in others].
-It's a tiny map with 5 players [4 AI] and every continent is connected Pangaea style.
-Each player starts out on one of the continents by themselves. [Each sizable for about 3 spread out cities, or 7 condensed cities]
-Alexander is my closest AI.
-Each player is balanced [I'd say] resource wise. While I actually am at a disadvantage though
~My immediate resources aren't great. I have Pigs close-by, Corn a little further, and Wheat a little further than that. Other than that, I just have Copper directly between me and Alexander. Alexander is a little bit closer, so I have to rush a settler+warrior to grab it asap.
~Alexander has Stone and Wheat close-bye, and Deer further up.
~Gandhi has Sheep and Wheat close-by one city, an already built mine on a hill between his cities, and Marble near his other city.
-Some AI's are O/P and one is weak. What we all start with
I play Mongolia. I always have. Not sure why, I just like them and I always seem to do better with them than others. However, I've customized what each Civ starts out with unit wise.
~I start out with a Worker and a Settler and have a slightly larger continent than the rest.
~Alexander [Southwest of me] starts out with a Worker and a Settler too
~Napoleon [Southwest of Alexander] starts out with 3 Warriors, a Settler, and a Swordsman. [Although this sounds O/P, his citys only source of food or money is a nearby Oasis. He's surrounded by a vast Desert, but his region also has a "Mountain Gateway". He's easily my smallest threat]. If he played smart, he'd smack a city at the floodplains on the outskirts of the desert... but so far I haven't seen him do so.
~Gandhi starts out with 2 settlers at each end of his oblong continent.
~Roosevelt starts out with a Fast Worker and a Settler [And I believe that because of this, he's my biggest obstacle... as he's farthest away from me on the map. He gets big and strong, fast].
I'm using a simple custom scenario to test it.
-Time is Marathon [I like Marathon and Epic because I don't like that Axemen get obsolete so fast in others].
-It's a tiny map with 5 players [4 AI] and every continent is connected Pangaea style.
-Each player starts out on one of the continents by themselves. [Each sizable for about 3 spread out cities, or 7 condensed cities]
-Alexander is my closest AI.
-Each player is balanced [I'd say] resource wise. While I actually am at a disadvantage though
~My immediate resources aren't great. I have Pigs close-by, Corn a little further, and Wheat a little further than that. Other than that, I just have Copper directly between me and Alexander. Alexander is a little bit closer, so I have to rush a settler+warrior to grab it asap.
~Alexander has Stone and Wheat close-bye, and Deer further up.
~Gandhi has Sheep and Wheat close-by one city, an already built mine on a hill between his cities, and Marble near his other city.
-Some AI's are O/P and one is weak. What we all start with
I play Mongolia. I always have. Not sure why, I just like them and I always seem to do better with them than others. However, I've customized what each Civ starts out with unit wise.
~I start out with a Worker and a Settler and have a slightly larger continent than the rest.
~Alexander [Southwest of me] starts out with a Worker and a Settler too
~Napoleon [Southwest of Alexander] starts out with 3 Warriors, a Settler, and a Swordsman. [Although this sounds O/P, his citys only source of food or money is a nearby Oasis. He's surrounded by a vast Desert, but his region also has a "Mountain Gateway". He's easily my smallest threat]. If he played smart, he'd smack a city at the floodplains on the outskirts of the desert... but so far I haven't seen him do so.
~Gandhi starts out with 2 settlers at each end of his oblong continent.
~Roosevelt starts out with a Fast Worker and a Settler [And I believe that because of this, he's my biggest obstacle... as he's farthest away from me on the map. He gets big and strong, fast].
My first attempt today, I was confident that I had strong strategy. I failed miserably simply because Alexander beat me to the Copper, which delayed my Rush until 90 BC [Far too late]. I also had trouble getting my middle city to work fast [It was always taking 30 turns minimum to get just anything done]. They kept getting crowded. Is this because I built too many cottages? It has no water nearby or any hills, so I can't build a farm or Mine either.
At about 3000 BC, I had raised and army of 10 Warriors and declared war on Alex. I stole his city on the Copper and made peace about 20 turns later. It wasn't until 90 BC that I had built up an army of 12 Axemen + 7 Warriors [I divided into 2 groups]. I declared war on Alex again and it was barely enough to take two of his cities and have a couple units to protect each city and 5 units left over to keep marauding. The remaining 5 units [2 Axe, 3 Warrior] got wiped out in the next attack on his other city [To my surprise].
I exited the game without saving because I looked at the year and it said 500 AD and I saw that Roosevelt was trailing me in Techs already. By the time I would take out Gandhi and Nappy, He would have had Muskets lol.
Should I shoot to rush Roosevelt first, then go for Alex? Roosevelt is quite a ways away though.
I'm also wondering if grabbing the Copper first would have failed anyways. Roosevelt is dominant so fast, and Alex is spamming cities in my way like a pest.