TheGentlemanSpy
Chieftain
Textmessage - approved, but I'm afraid I would like a new name, something not completely for the lols (although I do see what you did there). I will rename it myself if none is provided.
Tlaxcala work better?
Textmessage - approved, but I'm afraid I would like a new name, something not completely for the lols (although I do see what you did there). I will rename it myself if none is provided.
Latcher - serious concern. Coming from a lineage of photosynthesisers, I'm not clear on how it actually gets nourishment once it has attached to an animal's filter-feeding apparatus. Basically sitting in its mouth. It will be damaged by digestive fluids if trying to get to the actual nutrients.
Tlaxcala work better?
At the time I was thinking that the food would cake the inner surface in layers, not just stuff it all in a tube. You may withhold the surface area piece if you desire. I will think of something about the bacteria.
I was thinking it could transition its eating of bacterial growth and dead matter into eating said growth and matter from inside the filter-feeder "mouth", scrubbing it in a way. I am not sure if that is plausible, and I didn't exactly word it well, so the concern is well understood.![]()
Is this accepting new submissions?