[R&F] New Features Video

just some things i spotted:
Seems like Australia changed colors to Green-Black (minimap at 0:46) (is this already known?)
at 3:02 there's a scientific city state in the background, can't tell which one. Name looks longer than the ones from vanilla (maaaybe Stockholm though)
at 1:03 we can see that professional sports unlocks another building besids the stadium (maybe water-park equivalent...)
and that amundsen scott polar station unlocks with cold war civic
 
Hmm, if it were really the Mapuche, than it's even more likely we get post-exp DLC or a third expansion, because that's another staple they save for later + It makes Machu Picchu and Isabella more likely to appear later in a DLC (the Inca's + Isabella I DLC, yes they will be rumoured forever).
Don't forget Machu Picchu
Edit: Looks like you edited it since then.
 
It's a Golden Age perk, it's meant to be good. It will be irrelevant if you've been warmongering all game, but if you find yourself needing to do a bit of preventative conquest in the endgame, it will be helpful in not ruining your existing relations with other civs.
I don't mind it being good, I said it was stupid because it doesn't make sense at all. Casus bellis are supposed to make the AI ok with your wars when the war "makes sense". This new casus belli seems to make the AI ignore your aggression just because you're in a golden age.
 
There is a wonder in Cold War.

coldwar.PNG
 
So at 3:26 that is either Polynesia, or the Inca.
 
I don't know about that. Isn't that kinda what Bush did with the Iraq War? In civ6 terms, the US denounced Saddam and then a few turns later, we massed our troops and invaded. And we did not suffer that much warmongering penalty for it.
Well "kinda". It's safe to say that the americans would not get away with the "lol WMDs" another time. Also, it was a coalition of democracies against a tyranic dictator. America could not have pulled the same thing on a free, democratic nation.
 
City Loyalty Sidebar

Spoiler :

Screenshot 2018-01-17 04.42.17.png




Spoiler :

Capture.PNG

 
Last edited:
Why should other civs be fine with you attacking a free city?

Its a city that you setttled like the narator said its a "revolt". its you're people standing up against you. So a nation that fights off a revolt isn't considered a warmonger in real life diplomacy.

Atacking a city that joins a other nation on the other hand should give a penalty for warmongering but not verry high in my opinion something like a formal war penalty
 
I think the doom-mongers on here (myself included) were about on point with our predictions as to how much in the way of "full details" we were likely to get although it's good to see a bit more about emergencies and the new alliance system. Emergencies do seem a bit "meh" and my prediction is that the AI will happily ignore them in most games unless the bonuses for winning are more enticing than "free relic".

If the new leader (who I bet will be revealed next week) is in fact Lautaro of the Mapuche instead of an Inca leader, that will be a big shock and, as others have said, definitely point towards more DLC/a third expansion down the line. It might also suggest that the last two Civs to be revealed are more likely to be returning leaders than new ones (Cree, Georgia and Mapuche would be three "shocks"/surprising new Civs revealed in a row). This might be good news for Ottomans, Mali, Zulu and Celts, but bad news for Italy, Scotland or Ashanti.

The Chinese leak still might be right after all...
 
The mapuce would be a totally new civ.
I think their chance for participation is high.
Inca and Maya maybe next time (DLC or Addon).
 
Back
Top Bottom