No Israel in Expansion Pack?

Maybe, but Palestinian security forces don't roll into Israel with bulldozers and crush everyone in their way. A palestinian rifleman fires a shot and an (American made) Israeli helicopter fires rockets back, and tanks roll in to destroy the block. Palestinians are shot for throwing stones.

To say the least there is a question of proportionality. Oh, and nice wall...
 
Koheleth said:
And the world is filled with an irrational hatred of Israel that can be explained by nothing but hatred of Jews. Why is it that 30% of UN Resolutions condemn Israel, when there are dozens of corrupt, brutal, genocidal regimes out there (Zimbabwe, North Korea, Sudan, Lybia, Iran, etc.)? Why is it that every action Israel takes in self-defense, no matter how minor, is condemned?

Please don't confuse indifference with hatred. Other than Arabs, who hate for political reasons, and a few radical organizations who just want to pretend that they're Hitler, most people don't really care too much about Jews.

I don't care if you're Jewish. Nobody else here with half a brain cares that you're Jewish. We really don't care. Nobody except for the aforementioned hate groups hates Jews because they are Jews. Arabs don't even hate you because you're Jews. They hate you because of land disputes.

Why are 30% of the resulutions against Israel when there are evil countries out there? Because those evil countries that you mention don't really give a rat's behind about UN resolutions. Why would the UN waste their time with a resolution against North Korea when the Koreans are just going to throw the resolution into the trash?

Also, most resolutions have to do with Iraeli responses to Islamic radical actions. When those radicals attack there is no country to put forth a UN resolution against. We all know that the nations themselves are sanctioning it, but the groups are good at separating themselves from the governments. Yet the Israeli response is typically military.
 
Perfect_Blue said:
Maybe, but Palestinian security forces don't roll into Israel with bulldozers and crush everyone in their way. A palestinian rifleman fires a shot and an (American made) Israeli helicopter fires rockets back, and tanks roll in to destroy the block. Palestinians are shot for throwing stones.

To say the least there is a question of proportionality. Oh, and nice wall...


Your right, had they the resources they would shoot pregnant jewish women in the back of their heads after raping them and consider it a great day for their nation. The Palestinian helicopters had they had them, would demolish synagouges for no reason and shoot at civilians for shits and giggles. Their tanks would purposely run over people. Israelis would be shot at just for existing.

and thanks, it protects us from the terrorists. Although I do wish they'd change the color from Blood red though. =\
 
Anyways guys, get back on subject, this is getting way too political. Do you really want to see this moved to Off Topic, or get it closed due to baseless attacking?
 
Before the letter "J" was invented most languages followed the Greek script using the letter "I" followed by vowels to make the J sound. The Greek language still does this today.

Ierusalem
Iesus
Euvrei --> (ev-vreh-ee) --> Jew

I don't see how its politically correct to not include the Jews as Israel. Could someone clarify this? Because when I try to think of other cultural groups like the Medes or Persian, Minoans or Greeks, Nubians or Egyptians, Ethiopian or Abyssinians it all shows nations that were part of a cultural group that are representative of the entire group yet are still representative of the entire cultural group. Israel and or Judea are both groups who had citizens who were Hebrew. Why is it offensive to have them on here?
 
From what I understand it is based from the Arab market who would boycott the game if the Hebrews were in it.
 
Or its based on exactly what you see happening the minute this stuff gets brought up...

Same reason the religions are all the same, in one way at least.
 
Xineoph said:
Anyways guys, get back on subject, this is getting way too political. Do you really want to see this moved to Off Topic, or get it closed due to baseless attacking?

Given the historical and political content of the game, its hard to discuss gameplay mainly. Specially on this subject.You guys asked why Israel is not in the game. Some people tried to answer . Sorry, it seems is about political reasons.

But I am not sure yet which side wants it more than other to be closed :p
 
I am fairly certain the Pro-Hebrew/Israel civ would not want this to be closed, while the Anti-Hebrew/Israel civ do want it.

I just want them in, not just because i'm Jewish. I mean there are plenty of other civs I think are worthy other then the Hebrews. But anyways I want them in, because I felt like they made a huge impact on history.

Why else would there be such a heated and sparked debate, if they didn't make an impact on history?
 
zeeter said:
I don't care if you're Jewish. Nobody else here with half a brain cares that you're Jewish. We really don't care. Nobody except for the aforementioned hate groups hates Jews because they are Jews. Arabs don't even hate you because you're Jews. They hate you because of land disputes.

Also, most resolutions have to do with Iraeli responses to Islamic radical actions. When those radicals attack there is no country to put forth a UN resolution against. We all know that the nations themselves are sanctioning it, but the groups are good at separating themselves from the governments. Yet the Israeli response is typically military.

Ugh... you are an ignorant fool. When Jews were dhimmis (2nd class citizens, deprived of basic rights and forced to pay humiliating taxes) for centuries in Arab and Muslim lands, it wasn't because of land disputes. When there was a blood libel in Syria in 1841, it wasn't because of land disputes. When Muhammed exiled or killed all the Jews of upper Arabia (Medina used to have a huge Jewish population), it wasn't because of land disputes.

The Arabs have always hated Jews (although some non-Arab Muslim rulers, particularly the Ottoman Turks, treated Jews well, and Jews generally were less persecuted than in Europe). Go to a Sephardi synagouge sometime, like my family does. You'll hear countless family stories of how well Muslims treated Jews.... long before Zionism.

I don't mean to turn this into an OT thread, but I have to respond when people state blatant falsehoods.

Similarly, yes, Israel responds militarily towards terrorists (although, even when the response isn't military -- such as by building a wall, they get condemned anyway). So does the US. So does the UK. So does France. But only Israel gets condemned for trying to protect its people. Is that Jew-hating (the term "antisemitism" is stupid and dated)? Certainly in effect, if not in explicit intention.
 
Plenty of others get condemned too, trust me, there's plenty to go around.
 
HourlyDaily said:
Sorry to CivFanatics but this post is perhaps the sole reason why I dislike Israel and Israeli politics. Let me explain;

You have to understand that the issues are not black and white. Israel is simply not always in the right - but it acts like it is. Anything said against it is pounced on as 'anti-semitic' which it clearly is not. The victimhood complex really gets to me. People are genuinely sorry for the history of the Jews but there comes a point where you just have to move society on instead of always referring to the past atrocities and using it as cover for present actions. Israel holds all the power in its relationship yet despite slight majority public opinion - refuses to acknowledge Palestine and move forward with the two-state solution (Hamas, and co-operation acknowledged as problems) There are too many conflicting views and power-struggles within its Government for any movement. That is not hatred, it is a simple evaluation of the facts that people have made and come to the conclusion that the state of Israel is terribly hypocritical.

Your post quite frankly disgusts me because it represents the sort of extreme "we shall not budge, even though everybody hates us" confrontationalism (is that a word?) that makes people uncomfortable. I support the existence of a Jewish state, but I also support the right of Palestinians to their own.

No, my post is simply seeking fairness -- that Israel should get treated as every other nation. Does Israel screw up sometimes? Yes. Is Israel perfect? No. Duh.

But it's posts like yours that demonstrate the problem -- the evil of false moral equivilence. You expect Israel to move towards a "two-state solution." Well, about 75% of Israelis want a two-state solution, but there are few -- if any -- Palestinians who want the same. Every Palestinian leader (PLO or Hamas) has demanded either a "one state" solution, with Jews as second class citizens or shipped "back" to Europe (despite the fact that most Israeli Jews are middle-eastern), or a "two state" solution with a right of return to Israel -- or, in other words, 1 ethnically pure Muslim state, and 1 majority Muslim state with a persecuted Jewish minority. Sorry, but you can't expect people to just agree to be killed or persecuted.


I'll criticize Israel on a host of issues. But, unlike you, I won't pretend that Israelis and Palestinians are equally at fault, when the SOLE cause for the conflict has been the consistent refusal of Palestinians (and the entire Muslim world, save Turkey) to acknowledge Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State.

I don't like the term "anti-semitic," because it is stupid and misleading. But it is terribly biased to do nothing but criticize Israel without acknowledging that: a) all states are imperfect; b) that Israel faces very real threats to its existence, and to the safety of its people; c) that a substantial minority -- if not an outright majority -- of Palestinians want to do nothing but kill Jews; d) that there is no partner for peace; e) that -- like any state -- Israel has a right to defend its people. To hold Israel to a higher standards than any other state, to criticize Israel more than any other state, is irrationally biased , plain and simple.

If you're disgusted by us Jews not walking to the gas chambers anymore, than go ahead and be disgusted.

btw, I will note that this thread -- like many before it -- simply started out wondering why the Hebrews/Israel aren't included. Then it got a rash of posters attacking Israel for every little thing. I think this sort of proves my point (as if hundreds of UN resolutions, 5 wars, thousands of suicide bombers, irrational anti-Israel academic bans and divestment campaigns, etc.) that the main reason isn't in the game is because a large number of people actively and irrationally hate Israel.
 
Salamandre said:
Sorry, but here you are wrong. France chickened out. They do nothing, except strikes about getting more money. Everyday. :thumbdown While half country is burning...

Ever heard of Algeria? France killed 300,000 Algerians in the Algerian War of Independance.

How about today? France supports -- through heavy military and financial aid, and officially corrupt businesses -- roughly a dozen absolutely evil governments in former French colonies. People like Sassou in the Congo-Brazzaville. Without active French support, half of these governments would collapse.

How many marches, demonstrations, UN resolutions, etc. do you see against France's evil conduct in Africa?

I will concede though that when it comes to Muslim terrorists today (and non-Muslims unions), the French use only 4 options: run, hide, surrender, and collaborate.
 
Xineoph said:
I am fairly certain the Pro-Hebrew/Israel civ would not want this to be closed, while the Anti-Hebrew/Israel civ do want it.

I just want them in, not just because i'm Jewish. I mean there are plenty of other civs I think are worthy other then the Hebrews. But anyways I want them in, because I felt like they made a huge impact on history.

Why else would there be such a heated and sparked debate, if they didn't make an impact on history?

I know a good number of Christians (and have seen them post on similar threads before) who really want the Hebrews/Israel in because they think it would be fun to play as biblical heros like Deborah or Soloman.
 
Koheleth said:
Ever heard of Algeria? France killed 300,000 Algerians in the Algerian War of Independance.


Dont bring chaos here. We were talking (you were) about terrorism. Algeria is about colonialism.On the other points I will not argue, as you are right. Knowing that 20% french are muslims I am not sure what the gouvernement would have as choice, without fire a civilian war. But the 2007 election may change this drastically, I hope.
 
smjjames said:
personally I think it would be inappropriate to have Israel in the expansion pack, mostly politically and in other ways.

I'm fine with an Israel mod because then ppl can choose to have it or not.

To start, I'm one with very strong ties to Israel, having lived there for some time and with numerous family members who reside there permanently.

I think this thread is being taken COMPLETELY out of proportion with regards to the absence of any Jewish civilization. I highly doubt there was ANY ulterior motive. DROP IT.

The original post was merely disappointment about an aspect of the expansion pack. That was it.
 
Perfect_Blue said:
Maybe, but Palestinian security forces don't roll into Israel with bulldozers and crush everyone in their way. A palestinian rifleman fires a shot and an (American made) Israeli helicopter fires rockets back, and tanks roll in to destroy the block. Palestinians are shot for throwing stones.

To say the least there is a question of proportionality. Oh, and nice wall...

This has got to be one of the most propagandist posts I've ever seen.

Airstrikes are not launched in response to rifle shots. They are only used to kill known terrorists.

Tanks do not 'roll in' and destroy anything.

Israel does not 'roll into' Palestinian areas expressely to destroy anything. They do bulldoze the houses of terrorists.

Palestinians are not shot for throwing stones. That is a myth; behind every stone throwing crowd there is normally a militant with a rifle, using them as cover and as propaganda pieces when they get hurt in the ensuing firefight.

The Palestinian security forces, in fact, do jack ****; if they did their part to apprehend terrorists, perhaps things would be better. If you hadn't noticed, back in 2000 things were great in the area and the Palestinians were on the verge of being given their own state. The resurgence of the terrorists changed that; not anything that Israel did.
 
pub hero said:
Gee, well the empire of Israel is young, small and has won a war against Egypt with American weaponry. People are confusing Israel with with the history of Jews methinks.

Israel won two wars (1948 and 1967), both against Syria, Jordan and Egypt(those countries being also supported militarily by Iraq and several other moslem nations) at the same time, and both without any American aid. American aid only played a part in the 1973 war, at which time the Arab nations were the recipients of massive military aid from the Soviets and were thus on an equal technological footing with Israel.
 
Back
Top Bottom