wit>trope
Deity
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2004
- Messages
- 2,871
RedWolf said:Fair enough.. most people in the world believe that Bush's doctrine was/is lunacy.
Include a nuclear option and the US simply becomes a terrorist/pariah state.
Maybe, but they could plan it so that people wouldn't know that it was a nuclear first strike. An unarmed missile could be shot by a US ship toward the US and the US could shoot it down claiming it was shot by NK and at the same time nuclear retaliation could be meted out against NK. If all the command centers of NK are nuked, then NK would have no way of disputing the US allegation since there's no NK left to dispute it.
And the Bush doctrine isn't lunacy. Think about it. Suppose that Canada instead of a friend was an avowed enemy. Suppose further that Canada started amassing troops along the US border and started aiming missiles at US cities and parked all her ships off US shores in international waters. Suppose that Canada claimed that this was all just a training exercise. Should the US believe Canada? No, the US should see it as obviously preparation for war and preemptively strike.
Same deal with Iraq (I am not convinced war with Iraq was a good idea, but the principle is the same) and NK, Iran, etc.