Deliverator
Graphical Hackificator
Thinking about this, I've changed my mind from post 36. I agree that if a civ is in the game, other players *cannot* contract that resource.
Some shorthand:
UR - Unique Resource e.g. Caladanian Wind, Slig, Sardaukar Coop
URU - Unique Resource Unit e.g. Mentat, Sardaukar, Ginaz Swordmaster
To give the Space Port a purpose if all civs are in the game, and we have the Landing Stage (or replacement) providing the URs, I see two options:
1) As david suggests, we have a list of other imported bonuses that are not URs for civs. The Appendix has several other planets/items we could use for ideas such as Richese, the alternative-to-Ix machine makers, or Chusuk "the so-called 'Music Planet' noted for the quality of its musical instruments." These can have a mixture of benefits, some enabling units, some happy, etc.
2) We could expand the URs so that each civ has two, one strategic (i.e. enabling a URU) and one that gives some other benefit. The non-strategic ones could then be available for contracts (this is fudging the uniqueness I know).
You could do both of these I suppose, but that might be too much. I think option (1) is probably better.
Some shorthand:
UR - Unique Resource e.g. Caladanian Wind, Slig, Sardaukar Coop
URU - Unique Resource Unit e.g. Mentat, Sardaukar, Ginaz Swordmaster
To give the Space Port a purpose if all civs are in the game, and we have the Landing Stage (or replacement) providing the URs, I see two options:
1) As david suggests, we have a list of other imported bonuses that are not URs for civs. The Appendix has several other planets/items we could use for ideas such as Richese, the alternative-to-Ix machine makers, or Chusuk "the so-called 'Music Planet' noted for the quality of its musical instruments." These can have a mixture of benefits, some enabling units, some happy, etc.
2) We could expand the URs so that each civ has two, one strategic (i.e. enabling a URU) and one that gives some other benefit. The non-strategic ones could then be available for contracts (this is fudging the uniqueness I know).
You could do both of these I suppose, but that might be too much. I think option (1) is probably better.