sydhe
King of Kongs
I wasn't sure if I should pick Random or Racist. I like to choose at random, except that I don't like Montezuma or Isabella.
wioneo said:I usually pick an aggresive civ for the combat promotion. Furthermore I usually play as Rome because:
A) It was the first civ I played as(because Rome is cool).
B) They are aggressive.
C) Combat I Praetorians own everything!!!
and I don't like Phalanxes. How dare they start with the same letter!
Thanks. 10charSid the Lucid said:Random. I like to experiment with different strats on the fly and try out all the traits and leaders. I think playing random slightly steepens the learning curve but gives you a better grasp of the value and uses of all the traits and UUs.
Great poll idea!
Zombie69 said:This is a strategy game, and as such, your decisions should be based on strategy and nothing else.
King Jason said:I disagree. If I wanted just to win then this game wouldn't be fun. It got too easy a looong time ago (the civ series in general, but Civ4 is no exception for me).
I usually just play it as a civ-builder. Building a civilization to have a place in the world, be it conquest (usually how I end up finishing the game) or otherwise.
Hmm.. I guess in a weird sense.. you can say I use this game to Roleplay.
Though your quoted reasoning is why it's no surprise to me that Strategy is leading this pole.