donsig
Low level intermediary
Except this poll can't be binding. It's strictly informational.
Under our new philosophy there is no such thing as an informational poll. There are only binding polls.
Except this poll can't be binding. It's strictly informational.
What kind of philosophy is that? So your saying that all polls that are posted must be binding, even if they ask a question like: Do you think it would be beneficial if we switched to civic x?Under our new philosophy there is no such thing as an informational poll. There are only binding polls.
What kind of philosophy is that? So your saying that all polls that are posted must be binding, even if they ask a question like: Do you think it would be beneficial if we switched to civic x?
Furius said:When did we decide on this new philosophy, anyway?
If we want to have an informational poll, I see no reason why we shouldn't!
If you don't like a decision of an official, you can open a discussion about it and/or open a poll about it. The discussion is preferred to start, to get debate and allow all sides to present their case. If there's strong support, the official may allow change their views. If there is some disagreement, or time is short, a poll can be posted. This poll would require the official to follow the results of that poll.What if many citizens are against a decision of an official?
I agree that polls should be sacred.
How about we be proactive JUST this once, and discussion and pass an initiative to resolve this matter. Please? Pretty please? I don't care one way or the other, but for those that do, GET IT FIXED!