OrionVeteran
Deity
@OrionVet
Thanks for the info on real history and inquisitions. Good stuff. Don't want to take too much of your time, but briefly, is there any real history which implies that the church wanted to conduct an inquisition to potentially stop the citizenry from degenerating into civil war or revolting against the state itself?
I guess the theoretically possibilities is that the followers of a foreign religion is inciting rebellion against the state in one way or another, or that the citizenry loyal to the state religion, begin organising a rebellion themselves either against the state for not purging the foreign religion, or directly against the followers of the foreign religion themselves.
Avoiding domestic revolt of any type so as to keep the state functioning well, is one strong motivation for conducting inquisitions in the "Revolutions Inquisitions" mod. The question is if there is any reality to that.
Cheers.
Yes. There was no sanctuary under the law, to protect a heretic or one suspected of heresy from a tribunal's right to try, judge, and condemn the accused. Any heretical rebellion would be virtually crushed by the combined power of the Church and State. In Spain, the Inquisition claimed and exercised the power of enforcing the prohibition of condemned books. All owners of books were commanded to submit them for examination, under penalty of excommunication or even death. No bookseller or other person was allowed to sell or keep any book condemned by the Inquisition, and all such books were to be publicly burnt. Civil power cooperated with the Inquisition, while providing an effective machinery for a state censorship. There was a continuous warfare waged against culture and learning, from which no one was safe.
A large number of Jews and Muslims were given a choice, baptism or exile. Any resistance was futile. The edict was to convert or be expelled from their country.
The Inquisition only required evidence of two witnesses for prosecution. The accused were not able to call witnesses in their own defense, nor during most of the Inquisition, were they allowed to have counsel present. In some areas, lawyers for the accused were allowed, but if the accused were found guilty of heresy, the lawyer could also be so charged, for having defended them!
Since the primary stated goal of the Inquisition was to save souls, suspects were continually encouraged to "confess" to their heresy. Those that admitted their guilt, and were willing to give the Inquisition names of other potential heretics, were often let off with penances. However, some resisted and were unwilling to admit guilt: They usually ended up as victims of torture. The use of torture was authorized in 1252 by Pope Innocent IV. In Spain, it is estimated that torture was used in about 1/3 of all cases. The purpose of torture was to exact confessions.
The harshest sentences (such as complete confiscation of property or burning at the stake) were reserved for two types of offenders - those that refused to recant of their heresy and those relapsed heretics. Once a relapsed or unrepentant heretic was found guilty, they were handed over to the secular authorities for punishment.
The Church itself would not administer the death sentence. Rather, this was left to local secular authorities. The chosen method for administering capital punishment burning at the stake, was partially chosen because it did not shed blood! There was a pragmatic reason for charging, sentencing, disinterring, and burning the dead the goods of their families could be confiscated.
In all of History, next to genicide, the Inquisition is perhaps the most heinous example of systematic and authorized killing to defend a religious doctrine or faith.
Orion Veteran