Hitti-Litti
Deity
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2006
- Messages
- 3,767
^
Crusader Kings has a character system too, IMO it's one of the best features in it...
Crusader Kings has a character system too, IMO it's one of the best features in it...

Maybe at some point, they did an anthlogy for Hearts Of Iron 2 afterall, but I don't think it will be any time soon. Can't be sure though.Would Europa Universalis 3 ever be released with it's expansions in a box? I don't know if I'll be able to pay for downloads (one of the reasons why I haven't got Deus Vult for Crusader Kings yet).
I thought this might be interesting for folks looking to buy this game: Crusader Kings for $6 including shipping.
@D'Artagnan59
Poland, it's possible to conquer Germany if you work fast enough.![]()
But Victoria is horribly complex and unless you have a micromanagement fetish it is impossible to play anything larger than Belgium efficiently. HoI 2, on the other hand, can be played a lot more casually than Victoria and emphasizes action rather than economics. So if you want to build an industrial empire, go for Victoria. If you want to conquer someone else's empire, go for HoI 2.
Edit: And this is coming from a dedicated Victoria player.
I ussually play as either Greece or Britain. I have also tried France and Prussia. I would stay away from Russia though. In my experience it is not hard to have a reasonable economy (eg +400 in the 1860s) with Britain or France, but the AI is quite warmongering so i stoped playing as France since i am not interested in waging battle against 300.000 german soldiers..
Britain is a more relaxed game since you do not have to go to war with anyone and so can focus on your economy. Greece is the same, but in a smaller scale, here the goal is to have a +100 economy by the late 70s, and all core provinces.
The game does get boring though, when you have built all you wanted to. And endless war is not appealing to me. So i have yet to complete a game, although i have played tens of times.