Originally posted by Mr. Dictator
95
Originally posted by Wizard
Nobody likes them all! What a surprise!
Originally posted by Jeratain
Huh? That makes no sense at all. Windows 95 was extraordinary when it first was released.
I think some of you are using a bad comparison method here. Many of you are just comparing all OSes to today's standard, and that isn't fair. You need to be a bit more objective and compare based on the time that it was released in, the features that it included, the reliability/stability of the day (not the reliability of new hardware of today with an 8 year old OS), and so on.
3.11 itself was also a great improvement over the old Windows or DOS shells.
Anyhow, I'm going to quote from the original thread that I posted in:
Windows ME was the worst release ever by Microsoft.
I own/have used almost every version of Windows (starting with 3.1) and MS DOS (starting with version 4).
Of the Microsoft lineup, here is my ranking of all their OSes. Starting with best and ending with worst.
Windows 2000
Windows XP
Windows NT
Windows 98 SE
Windows 98
Windows 3.11 for Workgroups
Windows 3.1
Windows 95
MS Dos 4.0 and up
Windows ME
Why did I give these rankings? My judgement is based on experience ranging from: a)Ease of Use; b)How stable it is (or how often you get the Blue Screen of Death; c) Compatibility; d)versatility; and e)innovation
Windows ME introduced nothing new, and only proved to be the most unstable OS they released.
Link to original thread: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=31192&perpage=40&display=&pagenumber=2
Originally posted by hawai_74
All OSs from Microsoft suck, they always try to copy the Mac OSs
Two well thought out and intelligent posts.Originally posted by panzer_kevlar
Down with Microsoft! I hate all of their bull crap OSs that crash constantly and completely suck compered to Mac. Unfortunatly, Windows controls, like, ALL THE SOFTWARE EVER, leaving the far superior Mac OSs to rot.