I'm not saying you need permission (so you can give up on that distractive line of reasoning), just that you are on notice of tax consequences before taking a voluntarily action.
No news from VRWC, maybe he got insanely lucky.
Well, the expected payout of a lottery can be above $1 for each $1 you put in, but it's not really useful since your odds of winning are so low.
As a comedian on the Comedy Channel once put it, the lottery is a tax on those who aren't good at math.Don't buy a lottery ticket, don't pool you're money to buy lottery tickets. You won't win.
I'm not buying any either. They are just a voluntary poor tax.
If that were true, states wouldn't have lotteries because they would be losing money instead of making billions:Used to work in a convenience store, handled hundreds of lotto tickets a day. The rate of winning something is much higher than you might think. I'd say at least 40% of people got their ticket price back with their numbers. 10% got a little bit more, and 5% got a lot more. I've had people walk in with a seven dollar ticket and walk out with two hundred dollars.
If that were true, states wouldn't have lotteries because they would be losing money instead of making billions:
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-11/dismal-odds-winning-lottery-infographic
The overall odds of winning a prize are 1 in 31.85.
For example, the $1 Take Five ticket allows you to win $1 which has odds 1 in 8.82, $2 at odds 1 in 23.17, and so on up to winning $5,555 at odds 1 in 529,200.
There are some decent arguments for taxation but this one is dumb...
If I own property, I don't need government's permission to do so, I don't need the government's sanction to work, exc.
Some taxation is indeed a necessary evil. I don't disagree there (I REJECT that a taxation rate upwards of 30% like you have now is a necessary evil). But it sure as heck ain't consensual.
If that were true, states wouldn't have lotteries because they would be losing money instead of making billions:
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-11/dismal-odds-winning-lottery-infographic
If that were true, states wouldn't have lotteries because they would be losing money instead of making billions:
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-11/dismal-odds-winning-lottery-infographic
Ha, boy don't I wishBut sadly no. The winner bought their ticket about 100 miles north of me, apparently.
But that's not what you wrote:Statistical odds /=/ Results. Thank you, please come again. Like Zelig said, most people still lose.
That is 55% of the people winning or breaking even. It isn't anything like that.Used to work in a convenience store, handled hundreds of lotto tickets a day. The rate of winning something is much higher than you might think. I'd say at least 40% of people got their ticket price back with their numbers. 10% got a little bit more, and 5% got a lot more. I've had people walk in with a seven dollar ticket and walk out with two hundred dollars.
But that's not what you wrote:
That is 55% of the people winning or breaking even. It isn't anything like that.
The odds with any sort of lottery are abysmal. They have one of the lowest paybacks of any forms of gambling. It is essentially legalized stealing, at least when the state does it.
Even in this extraordinary case with an overwhelmingly large bonus carryover, every dollar you spend will only return $.98. And that is only if you agree to take the money in installments. If you don't take it in installments and want it all at once, your dollar is down to a $.68 payoff. And that doesn't include taxes...
But in most cases it is far worse than that.
If you want to gamble, learn how to play blackjack or craps and go to a heavily regulated casino. Or learn how to play poker. At least then you have a reasonable chance of only losing 5% or less of you money.