Predreadnought/Cruiser/battleship

This is really good stuff, but are there no BUTTONS for these early ships?
 
There are a couple taken from the Civelopedia for my mod if you want me to upload them..
 
There are a couple taken from the Civelopedia for my mod if you want me to upload them..
Please do.... I would really love buttons for your Armored Cruiser and Steam Battleship (errr... whatever you call these things!)

Great work... would love buttons for them!
 
Got your PM. I will get the for you right now.

FYI, I actually think these are kind of bad and was planning on redoing them when I could, so if I get around to it you might see a new version.

Edit: Here you go.
 

Attachments

Thanks for the Buttons... not the greatest but better then reusing an existing one, so I'm happy.

Thanks again for the naval units!

Does your Canopus pre-dreadnought have turrets yet? I thought I recalled you mentioning you haven't put turrets on the thing yet?!?!
 
Yeah it does, they do not sit perfectly, but they are on. It was just in the render they did not have them.
 
Yeah it does, they do not sit perfectly, but they are on. It was just in the render they did not have them.
How about a BUTTON for that Canopus?
 
Hehe... nevermind GeneralMatt... I finally figured out how to make my own buttons! I finally found DDS converter 2.
 
If I know better, I would say that this ship would be sutable as an ocean going Ironclad. Since this ship reminds me of the HMS Agincourt.

HMS_Agincourt.jpg
 
That is what it was.. That is nice Ship, the Agincourt, when I get to redoing this one that will be the one I model from.
 
Here's a better picture of the type... Agincourt's sister ship, the HMS Minotaur.

h76900.jpg




Here's a differant angle of the HMS Northumberland...

H75982.jpg



Personally, I think something like the HMS Hercules would be a better ship as the Ironclad Battleship

hercules.jpg


She was the first warship to carry the new 10-inch muzzle-loading rifle, which were ranged four on either side in a box battery. The foremost and aftermost guns could be traversed to fire to within a few degrees of the line of the keel through recessed embrasures in the battery walls. These guns, each of which weighed 18 tons, fired a shell weighing 400 pounds with a muzzle velocity of 1,380 ft/s. A well-trained crew could fire one shot every 70 seconds.

A 9-inch gun was placed on the mid-line on the main at stem and stern to provide end-on fire, and the 7-inch guns were mounted either side fore and aft on the upper deck, with firing embrasures cut to allow either end-on or broadside fire.
 
Cool! Those are definitely what I will be doing!
 
Here's more ironclads...

Austrian Ironclad
new_kaiser.jpg



CSS Stonewall
Stonewal.jpg



Actual naval battles during the ironclad era are pretty rare... the most notable would have been between Italy and Austria in the Battle of Lissa (1866).
 
Yes, that plus the Monitor and Merrimac duel, for well known.
Thanks for the pics!
 
Yes, that plus the Monitor and Merrimac duel, for well known.
Thanks for the pics!
I was speaking of ocean-going ironclad FLEET duels... not two ironclad gunboats in a river.

The Battle of Lissa is the only one I can think of off the top of my head that involved two ironclad fleets in a duel on the high seas.

Oh... and they always get that name wrong... "Monitor and Merrimac"... it's actually "USS Monitor and CSS Virginia" duel!
 
I was speaking of ocean-going ironclad FLEET duels... not two ironclad gunboats in a river.

The Battle of Lissa is the only one I can think of off the top of my head that involved two ironclad fleets in a duel on the high seas.

Oh... and they always get that name wrong... "Monitor and Merrimac"... it's actually "USS Monitor and CSS Virginia" duel!

Yeah, I don't know a ton about the whole business of gunboats, but popular perceptions sees those two as Ironclads, though they were sort of.

I think the reason that this era may have been ignored was because there was very few actual wars between major powers (Pax Britannica's I think) so there is not a lot of focus on the time.

Which is really too bad...
 
It's really a matter of size and function... the Monitor and Virginia (ex-Merrimac) were both "ironclads"... the simplest meaning of the word being that these were vessels that were "clad in iron".

Of course, you can "ironclad" just about any ship you want. In the case of the Civil War, 99.9% of all ironclads were little more then river gunboats... smallish vessels with little to no sea-keeping qualities... though the CSS Stonewall was a true ocean-going ironclad, it never saw action in the Civil War (but did see action when sold to Japan).

For the sake of European powers and Civ4, obviously folks are going to "ironclad" ships bigger then a gunboat... like ironclading bigger ocean-going vessels... this is the timeframe when terms like "Cruisers" and "Battleships" started to come about. Due to limited coal capacity and burning efficiency, most Ironclads of the mid to late 1800s still carried masts to harness the wind when burning coal 24/7 wasn't cost or fuel efficient.

It always irked me that Civilization assumed the only Ironclads were US Civil War era river-gunboats and that nobody ever bothered to ironclad an ocean going vessel, which (like the missing Hitler in Civ4) simply isn't true to history.

Thanks to Matt's work, we have more ship models to represent this forgotten yet still important part of maritime history.
 
Yeah, In Civ 2 it was a Gunboat, in Civ 3 a Gunboat and here again..

Anyways, I should be able to get to these soon, after the Xebec I guess. The funny thing is, I was leafing through one of my little brothers 'I Spy' Books when I was bored and on one of the pages when I saw on the back of a playing card I guess, a ship, and under it the word Xebec! Looked quite cool to.
A sign from above maybe.. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom