Quick Answers / 'Newbie' Questions

IIRC you can spy cities with a religion if you:
have the holy city
have the shrine
embrace that religion
 
agressive and expa(e)nsive?

Your English is as well honed as your wit sir.

Do you guys usually switch to Free Religion as soon as you get it? I used to, but RJ instructed me on the value of Organized Religion, plus I usually build the University of Sangore and sometimes capture the Spiral Minaret, so now I don't usually go FR until the tech (Computers?) that obsolete's Sangore.
 
Your English is as well honed as your wit sir.
Once again, does this forum really have to move to politics? Doesn't that belong in an OT forum somewhere? I shouldn't have to point this out, but the President STILL has the support of a sizeable portion of the US population (myself included), many of whom may be Civ fanatics.

That said, I really don't think I care to read about a Frenchman's (I assume based on the location) opinion of my commander-in-chief in this forum; especially since I'll willing to bet some rather choice things could be said about France's elected leader, whom, no doubt, many French people support.

I am hoping we are adult enough to police ourselves without the moderators.

Do you guys usually switch to Free Religion as soon as you get it? I used to, but RJ instructed me on the value of Organized Religion, plus I usually build the University of Sangore and sometimes capture the Spiral Minaret, so now I don't usually go FR until the tech (Computers?) that obsolete's Sangore.

Well, though I only played one game (I have played all the Civs past though), I found that FR was not good at really any stage (until perhaps the very end). However, this was because my civilization was vastly and almost exclusive one religion and I had managed to spread that religion over most of the world in ancient and medieval times.
 
Once again, does this forum really have to move to politics? Doesn't that belong in an OT forum somewhere? I shouldn't have to point this out, but the President STILL has the support of a sizeable portion of the US population (myself included), many of whom may be Civ fanatics.

My statement was a simple compliment to another poster who made a clever point. I then asked a question about Civ. As for the 30% of Americans who do and will support President Bush under any circumstances, I'm simply not impressed.

That said, I really don't think I care to read about a Frenchman's (I assume based on the location) opinion of my commander-in-chief in this forum; especially since I'll willing to bet some rather choice things could be said about France's elected leader, whom, no doubt, many French people support.

I thought you were trying to avoid political talk? Why are you starting a new one?



I am hoping we are adult enough to police ourselves without the moderators.

You're reanimating a brief and and already finished conversation.

But you still need the shrine like fieldmarshall says, right?

Having the holy city (Cross with a star) AND the state religion (Christianity) will get you line of sight in all cities where that religion (Christianity) is present. Switching to Free Religion cancels this, because it abolishes state religion. Switching to Islam would also kill your line of sight to Christian cities, but give you vision of Muslim cities if you have the Muslim shrine. Whatever state religion you have (or none due to Free Religion) you still get the shrine income, 1/city with the corresponding religion present.
 
My statement was a simple compliment to another poster. As for the 30% who do and will support President Bush under any circumstances, I'm simply not impressed.
Those that support Bush are likewise unimpressed with people that would call the leader of our nation "Dumb" and more or less poo-poo anyone who supports the President by saying they are "unimpressed."

I thought you were trying to avoid political talk? Why are you starting a new one?
I said nothing other than that something COULD be said. I was making a point, I said nothing deragotory about the French leader or French people in general, can either of you say the same concerning President Bush?

You're reanimating a brief and and already finished conversation.
*I* am? All you had to say was, "You are right, we don't need to discuss politics here." Instead you decide to reopen the door yourself by telling us all essentially what you think of 30% of the American population, of which I am a part of.

Edit: To clarify, I think you would be hard-pressed to find a single person that "[does] and [would] support President Bush under any circumstances", much less 30%. Perhaps, you meant 30% that agree with *most* of his policies.
 
Those that support Bush are likewise unimpressed with people that would call the leader of our nation "Dumb" and more or less poo-poo anyone who supports the President by saying they are "unimpressed."


I said nothing other than that something COULD be said. I was making a point, I said nothing deragotory about the French leader or French people in general, can either of you say the same concerning President Bush?


*I* am? All you had to say was, "You are right, we don't need to discuss politics here." Instead you decide to reopen the door yourself by telling us all essentially what you think of 30% of the American population, of which I am a part of.

I'm not taking the bait. We were done with this conversation before you restarted it, and I'm still done.
 
I'm not taking the bait. We were done with this conversation before you restarted it, and I'm still done.

Good. Maybe I should have followed your current example and not "taken the bait" when you and the other poster threw it out there to begin with. In either case, I am glad this is resolved.
 
Well Cabert and Lord Parkin, we've certainly been put on notice.



The Beyond the Sword expansion pack is supposedly debuting in July. I certainly hope the name refers to guns and tanks rather than diplomacy and culture, which I am categorically against. Does anyone know of a CF thread or a website with information on it?

By the way, I think most civ enthusiasts would get a kick out of a book I just read, Guns, Germs and Steel. It'll make you very grateful that the game distributes resources on a somewhat balanced basis rather than a historically accurate one.

Edit: Here's something. Firaxis finally discovered Babylon!

"Key features include:

* Expanded Epic Game: Firaxis Games delivers a massive increase in new units, buildings, and technologies to the epic game with additional focus on the late-game time periods.
* New Game Scenarios: The expansion will deliver 12 new scenarios, many containing themes never before included in the Civilization series, custom designed by the team at Firaxis and select members of the Civ Fan Community.
* New Civilizations: The expansion pack includes ten new civilizations, such as Portugal, Babylon and Netherlands and their associated unique units and buildings.
* More Civilization Leaders: Sixteen new leaders including leaders for the ten new civilizations, as well as additional leaders for existing civilizations.
* Corporations: A new gameplay feature that allows players to create corporations and spread them throughout the world. Each corporation provides benefits in exchange for certain resources.
* Espionage: Now available much earlier in the game, this expanded feature offers players many new ways to spy on opponents, stir citizen unrest and defend their government’s secrets.
* Events: New random events such as natural disasters, pleas for help, or demands from their citizens will challenge players to overcome obstacles in order for their civilizations to prosper.
* New Wonders: Five new wonders await discovery including the Statue of Zeus, Cristo Redentor, Shwedagon Paya, the Mausoleum of Maussollos, and the Moai Statues.
* Expanded Space Victory: Winning the race to Alpha Centauri will now require more strategic planning and tactical decision making.
* Apostolic Palace: The United Nations will become available earlier in the game, providing a way for players to win a diplomatic victory earlier. New resolutions will also be added which will expand the available diplomatic options.
* Advanced Starts: A major fan request, this new feature will enable players to “buy” components of a custom-tailored empire and begin play in the later part of the game, allowing them to experience many of the new features of the expansion pack in a shorter amount of time.
* Enhanced AI: The AI has received many enhancements, making it tougher to beat on the higher difficulty levels. The ways in which the AI will attempt to achieve victory have also been expanded."
http://home.businesswire.com/portal...d=news_view&newsId=20070328005486&newsLang=en
 
The Beyond the Sword expansion pack is supposedly debuting in July. I certainly hope the name refers to guns and tanks rather than diplomacy and culture, which I am categorically against. Does anyone know of a CF thread or a website with information on it?

By the way, I think most civ enthusiasts would get a kick out of a book I just read, Guns, Germs and Steel. It'll make you very grateful that the game distributes resources on a somewhat balanced basis rather than a historically accurate one.

i'm categorically for more options for all playstyles, not restricting choices. i'm interpreting various lines on the website as applying to both (admittedly i'm biased).

and yes, i read about that book on CFC. it's on my birthday list :)

edit: i've been reading threads specifically about BtS as well, and thought this was one. didn't mean to make this already long thread longer, i'll keep better track of which thread i'm in oopsies.
 
i'm categorically for more options for all playstyles, not restricting choices. i'm interpreting various lines on the website as applying to both (admittedly i'm biased).

and yes, i read about that book on CFC. it's on my birthday list :)

edit: i've been reading threads specifically about BtS as well, and thought this was one. didn't mean to make this already long thread longer, i'll keep better track of which thread i'm in oopsies.

I was kidding about opposing diplomacy and culture, those are fine for other people as long as they don't try to force them on me (I'm kidding again). According to the press release, it looks like non military victory options will be enhanced which seems only fair for the non blood thirsty tyrants out there (sissies). As of Warlords, the game is definitely stacked towards warmongers, and I'm told that's especially true at the higher levels where the AI can easily out produce you but still can't strategically outmaneuver you.


As for GGS, it's been out for awhile, it might be worth checking your library, I only had to wait about a week for it at mine.
 
Hi guys,

my first post here :)

Is there a way to sabotage enemy city buildings (like SDI :)) in "vanilla" civ (or mod, if any)?
Thanx,

ll
 
Well Cabert and Lord Parkin, we've certainly been put on notice.
*smirk* ... TAG!!! YOU'RE IT!!!

The Beyond the Sword expansion pack is supposedly debuting in July. I certainly hope the name refers to guns and tanks rather than diplomacy and culture, which I am categorically against. Does anyone know of a CF thread or a website with information on it?

I wikipedia'ed it but it didn't seem to say much more. I am excited about the "corporations" bit. That seems really interesting. Still, I just got Civ 4 itself. I haven't even gotten around to getting Warlords yet, reasoning that I should at least play a few games on "regular" Civ 4 first before I get the expansion. Then again, should I?

What do you guys think? Would you recommend just going out and getting Warlords right away or would I miss out on a "learning phase" or anything by not playing Civ 4 for a bit first?
 
What do you guys think? Would you recommend just going out and getting Warlords right away or would I miss out on a "learning phase" or anything by not playing Civ 4 for a bit first?

There's nothing to be gained by playing Civ4 first if you're going to get Warlords. It's probably cheaper to get them together. If you already have Civ4, you might as well wait for Beyond the Sword which will almost certainly incorporate the new units, civs and concepts from Warlords.
 
ZeroAngel: i don't think it's a matter of missing out by not playing vanilla first, more a matter of budget. i predict that if you do like vanilla, you'll want to get BtS when it comes out, to be "up to date" when the frenzy hits CFC! so figure that into the equation hehe.

a4phantom: glad to hear you were kidding, i tried my best to not go :ar15: on you right away ;)
 
a4phantom: glad to hear you were kidding, i tried my best to not go :ar15: on you right away ;)

Whew. Looks like I dodge a slew of bullets there. I thought letting blood and steel do the talking was my diplomatic method (substitute?) not yours.
 
The Beyond the Sword expansion pack is supposedly debuting in July. I certainly hope the name refers to guns and tanks rather than diplomacy and culture, which I am categorically against. Does anyone know of a CF thread or a website with information on it?

By the way, I think most civ enthusiasts would get a kick out of a book I just read, Guns, Germs and Steel. It'll make you very grateful that the game distributes resources on a somewhat balanced basis rather than a historically accurate one.

Edit: Here's something. Firaxis finally discovered Babylon!

You didn't have to look that far. The front page of this site would have sufficed. A link to the discussion thread about the new features is also present on the front page.

Hi guys,

my first post here :)

Is there a way to sabotage enemy city buildings (like SDI :)) in "vanilla" civ (or mod, if any)?
Thanx,

ll

You can only sabotage buildings, units and wonders during construction. You need to move a spy into the city where it is being constructed and quite a lot of money. And then you can sabotage the production removing half of the hammers invested in the construction. The amount of money needed is related to the amount of hammers that are going to be destroyed, but I don't know the ratio. The mission can fail and the failure chance is higher when the enemy city contains a large number of units or a foreign spy.

After the construction of the SDI, you could still find out where it is constructed and then capture or destroy that city.
 
IIRC you can spy cities with a religion if you:
have the holy city
have the shrine
embrace that religion
The shrine is not a requirement for the line of sight benefit. The other criteria are correct.

Do you guys usually switch to Free Religion as soon as you get it? I used to, but RJ instructed me on the value of Organized Religion, plus I usually build the University of Sangore and sometimes capture the Spiral Minaret, so now I don't usually go FR until the tech (Computers?) that obsolete's Sangore.
I have not used Free Religion in any of my latest games. University of Sankore, Spiral Minaret, and Organised Religion / Theocracy are just too powerful to throw away a state religion, IMHO. :)

Interesting that we've finally got some news on the second expansion pack. Judging from the information provided, it looks hopeful that we will see a lot of new content in the main epic game, which is the most important thing for me (I don't particularly care much for scenarios). :)
 
Back
Top Bottom