Care to say why? And when?
This seems to be down the road a bit yet isn't it? And why would trade ships and caravans need to be used for equipment and supply for units? Separate vehicles in my mind.
Those will be options.And what about those that may not want to use the equipment mod? Or supply lines? Just sayin'.
Is C2C as it goes down this road going to need to be 2 separate Mods?
Because you'll be needing them for supply line modifications later, to transport goods and equipment, even yields, a need that will far exceed any limits that can be placed on these units which are rather trivial and not completely critical to success at this time. These additional needs for the merchant role to fill would never be non-optional, but balancing for those options before it becomes necessary to make them unlimited entirely is a good way to prepare for that eventuality.
Merchant vehicles/units are shipping utilities. Why would we want to duplicate them?
As stated, I would not want to enforce it HAS to play that way, but being balanced so it can play either way with the smallest of adjustments is going to make that more possible.
Not worried. I knew you've been doing units. Just knew that it would be awhile yet. Heck I may be dead before you do this! And please, don't be offended that I like to play a little bit less complicated. Plus Civic testing just doesn't give me the time to try all options. Or use them either. Basic play to set stage for Civics platform.
I'm not. I'm just saying I'm trying to keep it less complicated to minimize the differential between options as they are being considered.
Worldwiews are treated as normal buildings internally.
Thanks for answer
Yes they are from before we had auto builds. Perhaps it is time to see if the method should be changed.
If worldviews were converted into ordinances, they could be local or national, and they could be made buildable if the AI wouldn't build them otherwise.
In xml, all units have a "power" value, I guess it sorts them by that value. though, that value is casually set by many different modders who have different ideas about what that value mean and what/how it should be deduced to be.
There was discussion on discord about power, asset and flavour values, they are used by AI to measure value and for prioritizing (scoring system) of stuff.
Flavour influence what the AI decide what to build, invent, civic selection, etc. in that it varies what one leader personality would score higher than another. It's similar to iAIWeight values though that one means the same to all leaders while flavours have different meaning to different leader personalities.
Attitude modifier depending on player's score? wow that's why ais hate me so much ;D
If you haven't heard of your bug being fixed since, you can certainly report it in the SVN thread. Of course it's very unlikely that anyone will retrofix 11133 for you, but the bug will (sooner or later) be fixed for future versions.
Please?
