Recession Watch: July

Integral

Can't you hear it?
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
4,021
Location
Boston, MA
Recession Watch: June
Recession Watch: May
Recession Watch: April
Recession Watch: March
Recession Watch: February
Recession Watch: January

A look back: June economic summary in graphs

A look ahead:

June 2009 Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®
PMI at 44.8%


DO NOT CONFUSE THIS NATIONAL REPORT with the various regional purchasing reports released across the country. The national report's information reflects the entire United States, while the regional reports contain primarily regional data from their local vicinities. Also, the information in the regional reports is not used in calculating the results of the national report. The information compiled in this report is for the month of June 2009.



Production Growing
New Orders, Employment and Inventories Contracting
Prices Unchanged
Supplier Deliveries Slower


(Tempe, Arizona) — Economic activity in the manufacturing sector failed to grow in June for the 17th consecutive month, while the overall economy grew for the second consecutive month following seven months of decline, say the nation's supply executives in the latest Manufacturing ISM Report On Business®.

The report was issued today by Norbert J. Ore, CPSM, C.P.M., chair of the Institute for Supply Management™ Manufacturing Business Survey Committee. "Manufacturing continues to contract at a slower rate, but the trends in the indexes are encouraging as seven of 18 industries reported growth in June. Most encouraging is the gain in the Production Index, which is up 12.1 percentage points in the last two months to 52.5 percent. Aggressive inventory reduction continues and indications are that the de-stocking cycle is at or near the end in most industries, as the Customers' Inventories Index remained below 50 percent for the third consecutive month. The Prices Index was unchanged from May, indicating that the supply/demand balance is improving. Overall, a slow recovery for manufacturing is forming based on the current trends in the ISM data."

Unemployment report to be released tomorrow, instead of Friday.
 
...Brian Cowen said this morning that the total number on the register is now 413,500.

In the year to June, the Central Statistics Office says there was an unadjusted increase of 197,781 people signing on the dole, which is an increase of 89.6%.

The standardised unemployment rate in June rose to 11.9% from 11.8% the previous month.

... the Taoiseach said he expected the unemployment rate would be in the region of 15.5% by the end of the year and that it could be higher in 2010.
I think I will stay in my job until I am kicked out.
 
http://www.theage.com.au/national/6-surge-in-spending-buoys-faith-in-cash-splash-20090701-d57y.html
6% surge in spending buoys faith in cash splash
Peter Martin
July 2, 2009

AN EXTRAORDINARY surge of cash washing through checkouts has helped vindicate the Government's cash splashes, pushing retail spending to yet another record high in May, the fifth since the stimulus payments began.

In the midst of the global financial crisis and amid climbing unemployment, Australian consumers spent a record $19.5 billion in May, a full $1.1 billion a month more than before the payments in November.

Retail spending has climbed 6 per cent in the half-year since the payments began, after climbing only 1 per cent in the half-year before.

In Victoria, sales surged 5 per cent after climbing 3 per cent in the half-year before. The turnaround was starker in economically weaker NSW where sales soared 7 per cent after previously contracting 1.3 per cent.

Clothing and soft-goods sales led the way, surging 14 per cent nationally in the half-year since the payments began after sliding 1.6 per cent in the half-year before. Department store sales have climbed 12 per cent after sliding 2.6 per cent.

"Consumers are fired up to spend despite the storm clouds of imminent recession," said Commonwealth Bank economist John Peters. "We've had three stimulus packages, in December, March and April, and from this month the tax cuts promised in the budget. Every sector of retailing is performing better than before the stimulus measures, a fact that must engender some further fear and loathing in the stubborn sceptics."

ICAP Securities economist Adam Carr said: "Obviously retail spending has been buoyed by the hand-outs. But there is more to it than that. Consumer confidence has bounced sharply, incomes growth is solid and when you add to that historically low interest rates and a labour market that is so far holding up well - I don't think we'll see consumer spending wane."

Treasurer Wayne Swan said the 6 per cent surge showed the stimulus packages were working. "If you compare our retail sales to say those in the United States, during that period they went backwards 2.2 per cent. So it's very encouraging."

Shadow treasury spokesman Joe Hockey welcomed the news, saying it demonstrated the underlying resilience of the Australian economy, but he said it was not yet clear that the stimulus payments had been value for money. "The majority of them have still been saved … Over time we will get the full picture."

Retail spending accounts for 25 per cent of gross domestic product, and the broadest measure of consumer spending accounts for 60 per cent, making it possible that the spending boom will propel Australia into another quarter of positive growth in the three months to June, delaying further the prospect of a so-called "technical recession".
Happy times in Australia distort my perspective of the world's problems.
 
This helps homeowners by making them debt slaves right?

No, that's about making people who are underwater, through no fault of their own, somewhat.... less underwater.


I thought you all saw the explanation last month? :)
 
No, that's about making people who are underwater, through no fault of their own, somewhat.... less underwater.


I thought you all saw the explanation last month? :)

I saw it and laughed at it because it's a bad solution to a bad problem.
 
It's a minor improvement to a bad problem. Would you prefer no improvement to a bad problem?

Principal cramdowns and mortgage recasts should be considered if the aim is keeping people in their homes. Which it isn't, as should be obvious to anyone who knows that a 24% reduction in the mortgage payment doesn't make any difference on being underwater on a 125% LTV.

If a homeowner has a 125% LTV they'd have to get a 152% increase in their house price to break even on the cost of the loan (not figuring in tax deductions from the interest on a 30 year fixed at today's rates 5.38% or property taxes) over the lifetime of the loan at current rates. If they retained a 80% LTV it'd be about 61% to break even. The only way this will occur would at 125% is if at the time of refinance homes increased roughly 3.131% y-o-y every year for 30 years. If home values decline further or mortgage rates go up, that 3.131% the number shifts upward. (or 5.07% on average) Do you think neither will happen?

Also, you present a false dilemma. Do nothing vs. do something that is really stupid and short sighted because it maybe will help, hopefully, maybe...aren't the only two answers. "We can either do it this way or not at all..." is George W. Bush type diametric politics that yields awful outcomes.
 
To follow up, someone at 125% LTV would have to refinance at 3.4175% to break even on the loan.
 
If you want a politics of good choices and good follow through, you're living in the wrong era. That ended in the 70s. We live in an era where even the "populists" don't have the courage or the follow through to do anything that might be seen as anti business. So all politics is the art of compromising on doing the right thing and catering to the every least whim of business.

That said, it's not about the math, and it's not about whether people remain underwater. It's about whether some people who might choose to walk away from their mortgage choose to stick with it instead. If it accomplishes that, then it's a success. If it fails at that, then you are right that it is too little and too late.
 
Jorbs

JoblossPercentJune2009.jpg


http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

Nonfarm payroll employment continued to decline in June (-467,000),
and the unemployment rate was little changed at 9.5 percent, the Bureau
of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today.
Job losses were widespread across the major industry sectors, with
large declines occurring in manufacturing, professional and business
services, and construction.
 
If you want a politics of good choices and good follow through, you're living in the wrong era. That ended in the 70s. We live in an era where even the "populists" don't have the courage or the follow through to do anything that might be seen as anti business. So all politics is the art of compromising on doing the right thing and catering to the every least whim of business.

That said, it's not about the math, and it's not about whether people remain underwater. It's about whether some people who might choose to walk away from their mortgage choose to stick with it instead. If it accomplishes that, then it's a success. If it fails at that, then you are right that it is too little and too late.

If this is the case then the government should just pay off the mortgage for anyone who is underwater...
 
The economy is certanly not recovering. 9.5% Unemployment rate?! I'm concern for my own job security. I feel like a lone survivor in a zombie apocolypse :(.
 
If this is the case then the government should just pay off the mortgage for anyone who is underwater...

Again, politics :p There's too much conservative opposition. Can't be bailing out the little guy, after all. :rolleyes: It's their own fault and we can't risk moral hazard.


Snideness aside, this middle ground approach may or may not prove to be the right one, but some middle ground approach probably is.
 
Again, politics :p There's too much conservative opposition. Can't be bailing out the little guy, after all. :rolleyes: It's their own fault and we can't risk moral hazard.


Snideness aside, this middle ground approach may or may not prove to be the right one, but some middle ground approach probably is.

Doubt it. And I'm saddened you've become complacent with politics as usual.
 
More jorbs

Nonfarm payroll employment - 131.7 million
U6 - 16.5% (U3-U6 spread: 7.0%; a normal spread is around 4.0%)

Chart coming once I find one that links correctly...

--

Edit:

Another fun fact: women's employment share reached 49.8% in May 2009. Pretty much the pattern has been that job losses are primarily male, so male employment is falling towards female employment. [h.t. Casey Mulligan]
 
Back
Top Bottom