Strider said:It's as simple as this, I am content to sit here and let you destroy the game. I will remain here to pick up the pieces. However, inorder to fix the game you must receive my support, something you are far from doing. It is your choice, you have one last chance to prove to me, wether you are truely a divider, or a uniter.
Hmm, let's see.
You pointed out problems with the DG6 government. Who wrote the amendments which were acceptable to the people, and essentially tossed the entire experiment out the window to move back closer to what we had before? Is that the action of a divider?
During DG6 your advice was that number crunching was killing the game. I promptly stopped number crunching at the beginning of DG7 and tried to get everyone else to stop too. You suggested that we needed more role play, I promptly tried to play the entire first term in character. I did the things you suggested because I respected that advice and thought it was correct. Does adapting one's style to follow the advice of others sound like something a divider would do?
Unfortunately instead of receiving your help this game, I got refusal to follow the people's wishes, followed by silence and then this thread.
I'm not a divider. I see energy devoted to meaningless drivel like this thread instead of the issues which really matter to the game, and I've got to ask why you're wasting our time. I want to focus energy on the game.
It doesn't matter where the threads are. What matters is if we all participate in them. My opinion differs from yours, and I'm not shy about it. That's all, nothing more.