Does anybody know if there's going to be a 'revised' version of the 17f patch?
Because as it now is, I don't want it, even if the stack movement would improve game play mechanics.
I wont play with the wildly imbalanced "all AI civs vs. me" in tech development.
This feature alone, IMnsHO, makes the AI into a monolithic, non-differentiated lump, and makes the game nearly unplayale (at least for me) at the higher levels.... and thoroughly unenjoyable for me at anything above regent.
It turns into a crash-early-combat-only type game, because at least then you're not too far behind.
.......
And if they can't get the end-of-turn time down to something acceptable on a large/huge map, then Civ III, despite all it's new features is going to become shelfware.
Because as it now is, I don't want it, even if the stack movement would improve game play mechanics.
I wont play with the wildly imbalanced "all AI civs vs. me" in tech development.
This feature alone, IMnsHO, makes the AI into a monolithic, non-differentiated lump, and makes the game nearly unplayale (at least for me) at the higher levels.... and thoroughly unenjoyable for me at anything above regent.
It turns into a crash-early-combat-only type game, because at least then you're not too far behind.
.......
And if they can't get the end-of-turn time down to something acceptable on a large/huge map, then Civ III, despite all it's new features is going to become shelfware.
