Is it too early to give feedbacks for the Byzantines?
In the 220 AD scenario, the Seleucids are available from the start (with a single legionary).
I get a good flip, with all the eastern empire, including Egypt, intact. Sadly, the workers don't flip, so first order of the day is to construct new workers, because the 4 you get automatically won't suffice.
Having to refound Constantinople (should be renamed, still called Byzantion) feels right. It was refounded by Constantine, so building it from scratch is accurate. The western Roman Empire has a -2 "a first impression is a lasting one", is that intended?
You are really powerful at the start, and the only threats are barbarians from north of Constantinople. I think a drastically higher chance of the Sassanids declaring war would be in order.
Also, I think I vassalized four civs voluntarily (Axum, Kushans, two Indian civs).
To be clear on the UHV, what is considered Justinians Empire? The part in Spain as well? If the Western Empire is alive, should you attack them?
In the 220 AD scenario, the Seleucids are available from the start (with a single legionary).
I get a good flip, with all the eastern empire, including Egypt, intact. Sadly, the workers don't flip, so first order of the day is to construct new workers, because the 4 you get automatically won't suffice.
Having to refound Constantinople (should be renamed, still called Byzantion) feels right. It was refounded by Constantine, so building it from scratch is accurate. The western Roman Empire has a -2 "a first impression is a lasting one", is that intended?
You are really powerful at the start, and the only threats are barbarians from north of Constantinople. I think a drastically higher chance of the Sassanids declaring war would be in order.
Also, I think I vassalized four civs voluntarily (Axum, Kushans, two Indian civs).
To be clear on the UHV, what is considered Justinians Empire? The part in Spain as well? If the Western Empire is alive, should you attack them?