Or he could have died of exhaustion because he was lost and wandered through the forest until he reached the meadow where he could go no longer - and the bag had usual hiking stuff.
Or a bag of fade (couldn't translate "diluat" properly) acid that melts through the layers of fibers in a decent amount of time but not enough to save his life - which gave the man enough time to get to the meadow and die a horibble death.
OR that man is actualy a robot and the backpack he is wearing was his battery which was discharged some time while arriving on the meadow - so the "man" colapsed and apparently died .
OR he had in his backpack some uranium and because of a fissure in the lead case protecting it radiation leaked tward the man thus causing his death.
Yes, all of them are "right", and that's the problem with lateral thinking puzzles (aka riddles). They have too many answers and the one given in the back of the book is only correct by fiat.
When i asked a friend of mine he said that the man was carrying his mother-in-law and died of exhaustion . I must say, i would have never thought of it
Now that i think of it he could have also died from exhaustion because he was carrying his mother-in-law's choped body parts while running away from the police
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.