skadistic
Caomhanach
Maybe they should stop acting like the inbred bastard nephew.Mise said:I never said that we should give them money. I don't think they need money. I said that we shouldn't treat them like the inbred bastard nephew.
Maybe they should stop acting like the inbred bastard nephew.Mise said:I never said that we should give them money. I don't think they need money. I said that we shouldn't treat them like the inbred bastard nephew.
What a moron.Comraddict said:
They are both fundi, ignorant and intolerant. To me dogmas dont mean much if the three abovementioned characteristics are present. No religion should be fanatical or it stops serving its main purpose - educating people peacefully...Elrohir said:Don't be intentionally ignorant. They aren't the same, and you know it.
Gelion said:They are both fundi, ignorant and intolerant. To me dogmas dont mean much if the three abovementioned characteristics are present. No religion should be fanatical or it stops serving its main purpose - educating people peacefully...
I'm a little bit smarter than you give me credit for.
@Mise: Thanks for that input, it was really well said
EDITED:...for spelling purposes.
Well I was not in it.... if you want to link me to it I could at least read it.Trajan12 said:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think weve already had this discussion. They are not the same.
Poll explains it's all.Trajan12 said:P.S. Katheryn explains it all.
Yeah it doesC~G said:Poll explains it's all.![]()
theimmortal1 said:The ******** crazy Muslims speak out again (note im not pointing out all Muslims, just the ******** crazy ones).
I find it hypocritical that they are calling us out when they treat women like garbage.
Comraddict said:
Comraddict said:Maybe you should too. King also agrees with such statement, since he represents everybody, conclusion is simple.
from the article said:Known as a modest and pious man, Saudi King Abdullah has been hearing steady reports of a sharp decline in morals in his country.
from the article said:Abdullah regards this phenomenon as part of the corruption of Saudi life fueled by easy oil money that has wrecked traditional values of honesty and work.
Trajan12 said:
Do you know how many posts are in that thread, like hell im gonna go through all that!warpus said:I'm sorry, but using Katheryn as an argument for something actually reduces your credibility rather than reinforcing it![]()
I'm glad we have established that at least.warpus said:If Bush says something stupid does that mean that every American automatically agrees with him? Obviously not.
Winner said:Saudis should watch closely what their princes do in Europe or America. Three words: booze, music and girls.
They're the last ones on this planet who should lecture us about morality.
The whole idea is to prevent the crime happening in the future so therefore blaming guns to be present might be reasonable however the actual act of murder has only one guilty party.BasketCase said:When somebody gets murdered over here in the States, there are some people who try to blame gun manufacturers as an accessory to the crime (in those cases where the crime was committed with a gun, of course). However, something that holds true in EVERY murder case, no matter what: the forces of Justice always try to arrest and prosecute the person who pulled the trigger.
Again, if we want to prevent women to get raped we can ask both parties to stay home or at least the women who's the victim. The man who is guilty won't listen to our plead anyway so no point of trying to convince him of anything but mkae him pay if actual rape happens.BasketCase said:When a woman gets raped (this is in reference to my first link up top), it is the man who does the raping who is at fault. Yes, it wouldn't have happened if the woman had stayed in her home. But then, it also wouldn't have happened if the MAN had stayed in HIS home.
BS. US caused the cycle of violence to erupt so in larger scene US is responsible for it. For the invidual acts of themselves there's nobody else to blame than those that kill civilians.BasketCase said:When innocent Iraqi civilians get blown up or shot (this is in reference to the second link), the fault lies with those who pull the triggers and set off the bombs. It is the insurgents who are responsible for the violence in Iraq, not the U.S.
We can ask what has caused this behaviour, and therefore we could see it's because of western influence in some cases. However it's reasonable to say that in this case it's rather hypocritical to talk about such things if these kind of acts happen anyway.BasketCase said:And when indecent behavior is practiced in Saudi Arabia, it is Saudis, not the West, who are responsible (of course, that's all beside the point of whether or not any given behavior is "bad"--but if there's behavior over there that Saudi mullahs don't like, the fault lies with Saudi citizens who made the choice to practice that behavior).