I agree that Flight will be very useful at some point - for instance for pillaging Gandhis uranium. But since we are now engaged in an offensive war I think we are better off getting Industrialization and tanks first. They will really help with this since they can capture cities while bombers can only pillage and reduce cultural defenses.
Fighters and bombers are very powerful on this kind of map.
As an example fighters on a carrier off the Punic coast would strafe down the defenders at Thapsus while the ground troops get healthy enough to make the assault. Weaken the defenders enough and cultural defenses don't matter. Fighters in this game are even more powerful than the artillery in C3C. as they can attack from out of range of defenders. They aren't lethal like the bombers in C3C but weaken garrison troops ehough so that they don't sally forth while the groundpounders get their boots in the right place. You will take some hits from SAM but they usually don't kill the fighter and the plane will heal up pretty quickly on a carrier in neutral waters.
Were this a continental map I would agree with you that tanks are the tool as trying to reach deep into enemy territory with aircraft puts them at risk as they are town based, but any inland city on this map is at least two turns from the coast which means the tanks are just as vulnerable to counterattack as infantry during the positioning phase while carriers are offshore and can launch strafing runs from neutral waters and reach an inland cities. And as long as Hannibal is without oil.....

. Are we about to attack Washington in 6 turns? Otherwise Flight could wait until after Industrialization.
Perhaps our best bet will be a peace deal, if H will have it. Not looking at the save atm. Getting myself in trouble again... 

.
Nice work Brother Bede. 
Sounds like things are getting interesting... 
.