Sounds good.Athens already has an academy. Right . . . I knew that. Delaying a GS that we don't have a good use for is not critical.
I did some calculations on whipping a settler in Athens vs. building it:
If we build a settler in Athens immediately after the worker, and swap a corn farm for a windmill with Piraeus for 2 turns, we can have a settler ready to go on T59 with 1 hammer overflow. On T60, Athens could grow to Pop8.
If we put the worker overflow into a settler next turn, swap corn for windmill with Piraeus for 3 turns, grow to Pop8 on T58 and Pop9 of T59, and then whip on T59, we can have a settler ready to go on T60. We would be at Pop7 on T60, compared to Pop8 with the other strategy, or in other words, 9 food behind. If we combined this strategy with fast Monarchy, we would catch up to the other Athens on T61. We would net 29 free hammers for building units. The settler would be one turn later.
In Piraeus, if we build a worker now, it will be ready on T59. If we whip the granary on T55 and the worker on T61, it will be ready on T62. The hammers gained for other things (airship?) probably make it worth it if we can put up with the 3 turn delay to the worker and the lost GPPs.
Instead of Delphi whipping a library (worth only 1.75 beakers per turn now), maybe it should grow for 2 turns, then build a worker for 2 turns and whip that. We could save the library build to implement the whip/chop overflow after Math.
If G22 wants to play next, that's great with me. If we don't hear from him in the next 12 hours, I'll go ahead and post a plan around noon tomorrow (about 14 hours from now). (Not sure when I'll be able to play, though. Might work for me to play a few turns when able and post for feedback when I'm unable.)
Sure would be nice to have SCT's input on benefit of Alpha by then. What to research is the most difficult and important decision we need to make at this point. Also, what is the inclination of the known and surmised AI leaders we have to deal with regarding the dreaded You-are-too-advanced-to-trade-tech-with" rejection? If we're going to try to trade for all these lower level techs and trade Electricity to aid the AI in researching future tradeable techs, might we have to deal with this?