- Joined
- Mar 26, 2007
- Messages
- 7,920
I have confirmed Tachywaxon's test that giving cities for a peace treaty to someone's worst enemy incurs no "worst enemy" penalties. I will attach the test game below.
We definitely need to take Shaka Bacon Bit back from Ghenghis T164 by declaring war on him. Hamma is too weak to make peace with Shaka T163, as he says "I'd love to, but you have to talk to the other guy". We certainly can't stop the war by approaching Shaka without getting a "-4 traded with worst enemy penalty"
Spoiler :![]()
If we avoid giving Shaka any free war success, he should be willing to sign a peace treaty T164 for SBB and GhostTown. I like giving him GhostTown too because having a city on both sides of the war being threatened might enable us to buy peace between Shaka/Hamma by trading a tech to Hammarugawa.
...
We will have to pray that either we can stop the war between Hamma/Shaka T164, or that Hamma's monster stack hidden in the east doesn't come around Shaka Bacon Bit T164 or T165.
Maybe try to get Hamma to trade embargo Cyrus if peace between Hamma/Shaka can't be bought T164.
I doubt Shaka Bacon Bit is being guarded by Ghenghi units. Ghenghi and Cyrus do not have open borders.
If we stop the War between Hammuragawa and Shakagawa, we need only give Shakagawa GhostTown, since he has 77% Culture there, it can't flip to anyone else.
What do we lose by making peace between Hammuragawa and Shakagawa? I was concerned that Hammuragawa would abstain in the RL DV vote, because he can't choose between us and Shakagawa for RL DV. Now that I see Hammuragawa's visible Diplomacy with Shakagawa (-6) compared to our visible Diplomacy (+14), I'm not so sure, but how many Diplomacy bonuses will come back with a Peace Treaty?
Thanks for doing the test game.
Maybe you can put together a basic PPP, specifying all the key things we must do to win RL DV in t166, excluding the Hindu Population Total and RL DV Threshold.
Once we agree to a basic plan, we can include planned Hindu population changes, with the total planned Hindu Population and RL DV Threhold for each turn remaining? Making sure we are significantly under the RL DV Threhold by the end of t164. Finally spam Hinduism on t165 like I suggested in a previous post.
We worked extermely hard to get this close to RL DV, let's make sure we don't mess up something that let's our t166 opportunity to win slip by.
Sun Tzu Wu