Not to plug myself but lots of Polish tanks here: https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/armoured-warfare-around-the-world.607679/
Delta_Strife, you are perfectly entitled to plug yourself, as you also have no problems mentioning other unit creators and crediting them.Not to plug myself but lots of Polish tanks here: https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/armoured-warfare-around-the-world.607679/
A "counter-nitpick:"A nitpick, Polish cavalry doctrinally abandonned lances about a year before 1939 probably the result of reorienting strategically from the USSR towards Germany. Cavalry units to this goal were planned to be modernized into 4 motorized/mechanized units with light tanks (1 was completed and another partially, but both with only a single tank company), while the remaining brigades were to be become semi-motorized but retaining their mounted-infantry/saber-cavalry combat regiments.
I've made it so cavalry upgrade to light tanks using the M3 graphics from the war in the pacific scenario, a 9/6/3 unit that requires rubber (alternatively, just oil), and those upgrade into tanks which are more resource intensive (also requiring iron).
Buut, not with lances but with sabers (at least in this incident!)! I see some sources do refer to attacks with lances this is probably erroneous and an assumption about the "lancer" (in Polish "Uhlan") squadrons nature. But its not implausible some units had access to lances and used them. One such possible use was when the Mazowiecka brigade faced off the German 1st Kavallerie brigade in an small incident of mounted combat, reportedly here and in some subsequent cases Poles used lances as weapons.A "counter-nitpick:"
"The charge at Krojanty, battle of Krojanty, the riding of Krojanty or skirmish of Krojanty, was a Polish cavalry charge on the evening of 1 September 1939, the first day of the Second World War, near the Pomeranian village of Krojanty."
Just be thankful that @Wyrmshadow isn't around much. (His Polish Lancer.)
I think that some British tank squadrons are still called ‘Lancers’ to this day, or at least were into the 20th century."lancer" (in Polish "Uhlan") squadrons nature
Interwar: "British armored vehicles tended to maximize either mobility or protection. Both the cavalry and the Royal Tank Corps wanted fast, lightly armored, mobile vehicles for reconnaissance and raiding—the light and medium (or "cruiser") tanks. In practice the "light tanks" were often small armored personnel carriers. On the other hand, the "army tank battalions" performing the traditional infantry-support role required extremely heavy armored protection. As a consequence of these two doctrinal roles, firepower was neglected in tank design."I think that some British tank squadrons are still called ‘Lancers’ to this day, or at least were into the 20th century.
Yep - the Matilda II - even the Brits learned some, too, during the WarThe Matilda II could make 15 miles an hour, and was pretty much invulnerable to anything less than an 88mm gun of the Germans. They wrought havoc on the Italians in the first British offensive in the Western Desert. The Italian anti-tank gun was a 47mm piece with limited penetration.
The Matilda II was developed and being produced before the war started, once the massive limitations of the Matilda I had been recognized. The Matilda II figured prominently in the combat with Rommel's 7th Panzer Division at Arras in May of 1940. It was a major shock to the Germans, as the only thing that would stop one was the division's 88mm Flak unit.Yep - the Matilda II - even the Brits learned some, too, during the War
I sort of figured that one had been made. That is a nice unit. Now to get up the nerve to start adding units with the tutorial that Civinator so very kindly furnished me.The Churchill Crocodile was in fact made. Wyrmshadow made one; an earlier unit by smokingmirror was in a now dead thread.
You have my full Faith and ConfidenceNow to get up the nerve to start adding units with the tutorial that Civinator so very kindly furnished me.