GeneralZIft
Enigma
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2019
- Messages
- 128
Particularly chosen Stalin because he's modern, would make for a change of pace from typical Warmongering Leaders, who are usually with exclusively early to mid game.
I can definitely understand the argument. Maybe there's a Russian or USSR leader that is less controversial that could still make for a good, modern, militaristic pick?
Obviously Civ can have other leaders than Stalin for Russia for example, or for any other Civ (like France w/ Napoleon) - but a choice like that would still be interesting.
Don't some other grand strategy games have depictions of Stalin or even Hitler? Obviously Civ is more 'made for everyone', but just wondering
I can definitely understand the argument. Maybe there's a Russian or USSR leader that is less controversial that could still make for a good, modern, militaristic pick?
Obviously Civ can have other leaders than Stalin for Russia for example, or for any other Civ (like France w/ Napoleon) - but a choice like that would still be interesting.
Don't some other grand strategy games have depictions of Stalin or even Hitler? Obviously Civ is more 'made for everyone', but just wondering