Should we attack the Iroquois (last poll)

[ravensfire]

Actually wasn't there a vote scandal on the first or second term of this DG for war minister?

Kindof. A voter was found with zero posts who had not registered as a citizen. As they were not a citizen, their vote did not count, breaking the tie.

There was suspicion of other things (DL's), but no investigation was publically mentioned.

-- Ravensfire

 

[donsig]

A few interesting stats (ignoring abstains for the time being):
1. 14 people voted for war in this poll vs a max of 14 in previous polls - 0 % increase.
2. 17 people voted for 'No war' in this poll vs a max of 12 in previous polls - 42% increase

I do not have the time I once did to devote to the demogame. I try to log on once a day and usually go straight to the polls. But I don't always make it here everyday and sometimes polls close before I get to vote in them. I'm sure the same happens with other citizens. Just looking at vote totals from one poll to another doesn't really mean much.

 

[MOTH]

I do not have the time I once did to devote to the demogame. I try to log on once a day and usually go straight to the polls. But I don't always make it here everyday and sometimes polls close before I get to vote in them. I'm sure the same happens with other citizens. Just looking at vote totals from one poll to another doesn't really mean much.

I agree that is doesn't mean much. But in an evenly divided issue based on at least 2 prior polls that the addition would be more evenly spaced - ie: a 50% chance. The statistical chance that five 50% events all fall one way is a little more that 3 in 100.

A list of the voters in this poll could clear up the issue as there could be checks made against the previous polls. Maybe this would put the matter of war to rest one way or the other. Could a mod respond to my request or should I direct a PM there way?