jeps
Arcadefire
How exactly would a large-scale genocide show up in a nations stats? Would they only go down, or could it be possible to kill the uneducated barbarians, which would in turn bring UP the nations education stat?
Which makes things even better. What exactly are you complaining about? Empires rise, empires fall!
Which is where arbitrary moderatorial decisions come in. Plus I'm pretty sure there would be a lot of people working to undermine strong empires, both as rebels and as neighbours.
I have deterioration...I could randomly cause a plauge, or some such thing.
Meanwhile, the Eastern Empire also continued its trend of decentralization, though for entirely different reasons from the west. Because of the almost constant pressure created by the Parthians and their successors in the east and the various tribes to the north meant that most Augusti spent virtually their entire lives with their armies on the field. Because of this, as well as because very little of the bureaucratic mechanizations transferred over to the capital of Caesaropolis, most of the governing of the realm was taken over by local rulers who were given the title of Caesar. Unlike in the west, however, while having significant local political power, these eastern Caesars had no military power, as the armies were concentrated almost solely on the border under the authority of the Augusti.
However, because the Augusti and their heirs spent so much of their lives protecting the borders of the realm, there was the continuous threat of a succession crisis as the Augusti and their heirs were in perpetual risk of dying in battle. The fear was that in such a crisis, the various border generals would all strive against one another for the title of Augustus, leaving the border defenseless and the heartlands of the Empire vulnerable. Meanwhile, the Caesars themselves stood little chance of attaining the title in such a scenario as any significant faction of the standing army could easily brush past any levies that the Caesar’s attempted to raise.
It was one of the many reforms of Augustus Julius, himself heirless, that a solution to a possible succession crisis was reached. At the death of an Augustus, it would be the Caesars who would meet to appoint the successor. This successor, however, must be one of the border generals. In this way, both spheres of power in the East, the Caesars and the generals, remained satisfied. The Caesars not only gained the power of appointment of the next Augustus, but they also ensured that the border would remain stable, its armies not wasted in dynastic struggles. In addition, by electing only generals, they ensured that no Augustus would attempt to combine military with political power, threatening their own local political power. The generals ensured that the throne of Augustus would always be held by a military man, that the defense of the borders would always remain a priority. In addition, all generals had, in theory at least, the possibility of ascending to the throne without the risk that warfare brought. In warfare, if one sought the throne but failed, death was the only possible outcome. In this system, however, one could seek the throne and if failed, would still be able to keep their generalship, losing nothing. Lastly, the future Augusti benefited from this arrangement. With their own army combined with the wealth of the united provinces, they were virtually unassailable from civil war. Because of this, the wealth of the East wouldn’t be drained by constant succession crises and so each Augustus would inherit a stronger Empire than they would without this system.
No reservations. I'm posting this because I want your opnions on the rules and stats and any changes I could make. I particularly want your opnions on the Economy, and Tech level.
how do you intend to balance the massive powers that be in the east if they go on a rampage to the west? (this IS a NES).
Clean up the stats a little, but overall I'm very happy with the setting.
Maybe getting Strategos to do a snapshot of the world, including the Americas and Asia would help a bit.
4) Some military units are described as Eastern Roman Legions. Are these UUs?
silver, how does the East Roman Empire work btw? Are they vassals to Rome? Does Rome only control foriegn affairs? Is it still an Empire just very very decentralized?
The Western and Eastern Roman Empires, I guess, are supposed to technically be single empires (or, two single empires). They just are de facto many nation states who occasionally get together to vote on who gets to spend the most money on whores.
The Eastern and Western Empires can elect new Augustuses, and its the choice of the losers over whether to go to war afterwards or agree with the decision of the other guys.
The Augustus then could demand tribute, or he could just act as a figure-head if he doesn't want to push the loyalty of his subjects too much.