Stephen Colbert Lampoons Bush at White House Dinner

Irish Caesar said:
Would you prefer a country where the government gives the comedian the script beforehand and says, "stick to the script or its jail for you"?

Good point.
 
Irish Caesar said:
Would you prefer a country where the government gives the comedian the script beforehand and says, "stick to the script or its jail for you"?
ROFL... nice subject change. :)
 
blackheart said:
Proud that he had the balls to do it.
What "balls" did it take? None.

We're not talking forming a union in Communist Poland, or facing down a tank in Tiananmen square. We're talking a speaker at a banquet deciding to be rude because he knows the person he's being rude to pretty much has to sit and take it.

Sounds more like cowardice to me.
 
.Shane. said:
To me, that's what was ridiculous, how could they invite him and NOT expect him to do what it is that he's famous for?

Good point. After all, Colbert has no sense of what is appropriate nor any professionalism. And, it would be unrealistic for anyone to expect him to act as a professional for a half hour.

Ummm... that IS your point, right?
 
malclave said:
What "balls" did it take? None.

We're not talking forming a union in Communist Poland, or facing down a tank in Tiananmen square. We're talking a speaker at a banquet deciding to be rude because he knows the person he's being rude to pretty much has to sit and take it.

Sounds more like cowardice to me.

He had a choice; cozy up with all the other white house staff and press, fire off lame Leno-esque jokes, and pretend he is one of them, or stay true to his character, and play a loud, offensive and idiotic O'Reilly wannabe.

He played his part.

That takes balls.
 
Neomega said:
He played his part.

That takes balls.
I disagree.

He took no risk, even "professionally"... I'm sure the folks over at DU, Kos, Huffington, etc. are raving about him.

Maybe he's just stupid, and didn't understand what the banquet was about. Otherwise, it would have been more courageous IMO to turn down the gig.
 
malclave said:
I disagree.

He took no risk, even "professionally"... I'm sure the folks over at DU, Kos, Huffington, etc. are raving about him.

Maybe he's just stupid, and didn't understand what the banquet was about. Otherwise, it would have been more courageous IMO to turn down the gig.

OK, whatever dude. It was a huge professional risk.... and you know it, so quit acting like it wasn't.
 
Neomega said:
OK, whatever dude. It was a huge professional risk.... and you know it, so quit acting like it wasn't.
And YOU know it really WASN'T a risk... so quit acting like it was..."dude".
 
Malcave
You think that spending 20+ minutes criticizing the president of the united states like colbert did takes no balls.
You must disregard the fact that it has never been done before on this unprecedented level. You also disregard the facts that he did it to a mostly boo'ing audience and afterworld shook the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES hand; then later commented on how UNrugged and SOFT his had was.

That, my unapologetic friend, should be the definition of possessing balls.
 
What risk?
Did you not see V for Vendetta? I just keep seeing the "Not so funny anymore, is it?" scene in my head. :D

Seriously though, he's risking, at the absolute least, a fierce IRS audit.
 
malclave said:
Why?

What risk?

Okay, do you know anyone who has ever criticized the President in his face on public television? Ignoring scripted debates.

I mean, you're talking about the President here. Even John Stewart said that he couldn't do it, because he has so much respect for the actual position. I mean, come on, he's the President of the United States. It's one thing to criticize a President when you're not talking to the actual man - it's another thing altogether talking to the man himself.
 
Bill3000 said:
Okay, do you know anyone who has ever criticized the President in his face on public television? Ignoring scripted debates.

I mean, you're talking about the President here. Even John Stewart said that he couldn't do it, because he has so much respect for the actual position. I mean, come on, he's the President of the United States. It's one thing to criticize a President when you're not talking to the actual man - it's another thing altogether talking to the man himself.

John Imus, the radio host, insulted Hillary quite a bit at some speech/dinner/conference quite a bit when Billy Clinton was in office. Both Hillary and Billy attended. No, I don't remember anymore than that. I don't want to look it up.
 
malclave said:
And YOU know it really WASN'T a risk... so quit acting like it was..."dude".

No, I am not the one being obtuse.

So yeah, with your logic, Colbert wants to go from being a tv and movie actor to someone everybody praises in the blogs. Yeah right.
 
Seems to me that a few of you need to lighten up. Sheesh, W IS like platinum for comics and Colbert was funny. Now, whether this administration resembles the Titanic or the Hindenberg more is clearly up for debate.....which disaster is worse?

I can tell you that none of you complaining now would do so if it were Bubba, Gore or Kerry that were POTUS and the target of the same routine. I can also tell you, with certainty, that I wouldn't risk looking foolish and complain if they were.

Frankly, I love that Colbert did it, and I love it even more that it just p!sses so many of you off.
 
Back
Top Bottom