Naval fighter do not have bombard capabilities, only interception.
Naval fighter bomber have bombard capabilities, and lethal sea bombardment.
Fighter and Fighter bomber can both bombard, but of course FB are better, and fighter are better against plane. Fighter and fighter bomber are usually a bit better than naval ones, but they cannot base on aircraft when naval fighter can base anywhere, and the land base do not have lethal bombardment.
Last, Bombers have a greater range, and high bombardment rate, but they cannot intercept, nor base on carrier.
Of course, these are just general settings. There are a few exception, like the Japanese zero which get advantage of a naval Fighter and a fighter bomber, or the Stuka which is land based but has lethal bombardment.
I hope it will make games more enjoyable, and less repetetive : any time you play a new civ, you get lots of new units!
Naval fighter bomber have bombard capabilities, and lethal sea bombardment.
Fighter and Fighter bomber can both bombard, but of course FB are better, and fighter are better against plane. Fighter and fighter bomber are usually a bit better than naval ones, but they cannot base on aircraft when naval fighter can base anywhere, and the land base do not have lethal bombardment.
Last, Bombers have a greater range, and high bombardment rate, but they cannot intercept, nor base on carrier.
Of course, these are just general settings. There are a few exception, like the Japanese zero which get advantage of a naval Fighter and a fighter bomber, or the Stuka which is land based but has lethal bombardment.
I hope it will make games more enjoyable, and less repetetive : any time you play a new civ, you get lots of new units!