deanej
Deity
Arabia is easier on 600 AD because you're conquering independent cities that can't offer more than token resistance, plus two of the shrines are already built for you and are easily conquered.
I myself consider Mongolia and America easier on 3000bc starts.Mongolia cos China could be harrased by barbs most of the game,and America cos Europe's techs are more on par with yours.
Other civs i'm wondering about whats start is better are Arabia,Turkey,France, and Germany,though i would be happy for others.
I always found on 600ad that Byzantium always built Notre Dame.
What about England? Currently i prefer 600ad for them,just cos less time to have to wait for it to load,since nothing in 300bc afects them.Am i right?
All in all, the final version has sorted a lot of the quirks although the tech rate is absolutely insane if Rome, Greece or Persia survives. Worst case I have seen was Greece circumnavigating shortly after Portuguese spawn and grabbing Liberalism in 1200 or so.
Settlers are the best land unit for Persian and Mongolian UHVs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by usi
Settlers are the best land unit for Persian and Mongolian UHVs.
Funny, in my experience they can't attack and they absolutely suck at defense.
You don't understand what usi means? Seriously?
So, I think that only Delhi, in the 600AD start that is, may be worth taking, perhaps Sijaris too, and a Central Asian city of course. Any other is a waste of time and resources.
Is there a trick to getting vassals as Turkey? I'm 500 pts ahead of Russia and suddenly all the small christian civs I've been trying to vassalize all go to him instead. They were all pleased or friendly with me. Any ideas?