Surrender Summit II: Putin Invited to Washington

[Timsup2nothin]

Generally yes, though not as much consistent as it should be.

It has also not received the isolation that it merits as consistently as it should have, unfortunately.

 

[Mechanicalsalvation]

Cool, suggestion sent.

I hope you dont mind me saying I am tiny bit disapointed.

 

[Timsup2nothin]

I hope you dont mind me saying I am tiny bit disapointed.

You must have had some really unrealistic expectations.

 

[red_elk]

It has also not received the isolation that it merits as consistently as it should have, unfortunately.

Many things in our world don't go as you expect.

 

[Mechanicalsalvation]

You must have had some really unrealistic expectations.

Well I did prised you quite high after all didnt I?

 

[Timsup2nothin]

Many things in our world don't go as you expect.

There wasn't any expectation expressed there. I'm actually well aware that the human frailty of "give them a chance" exists, and that accounts for Russian dreams of grandeur at the expense of other nations not having been squashed...but it doesn't mean that they shouldn't have been.

 

[Timsup2nothin]

Well I did prised you quite high after all didnt I?

Prised?

 

[red_elk]

There wasn't any expectation expressed there. I'm actually well aware that the human frailty of "give them a chance" exists, and that accounts for Russian dreams of grandeur at the expense of other nations not having been squashed...but it doesn't mean that they shouldn't have been.

If only you'd have that wonderful president...

 

[Mechanicalsalvation]

Prised?

Anyway. Its good that new channel for really cool suggestion has been opened. It cant prevent mutual nuclear destruction which would be a shame...

 

[Timsup2nothin]

If only you'd have that wonderful president...

That can't be accomplished by a "wonderful president."

 

[Timsup2nothin]

Anyway. Its good that new channel for really cool suggestion has been opened. It cant prevent mutual nuclear destruction which would be a shame...

I'm still wondering what 'prised' means. Nuclear destruction seems a distraction.

 

[red_elk]

That can't be accomplished by a "wonderful president."

What a shame. But somebody still has to punish those pesky Russians for their dreams of grandeur.

 

[Timsup2nothin]

What a shame. But somebody still has to punish those pesky Russians for their dreams of grandeur.

Should, definitely. Has to? No, not really.

 

[Berzerker]

Tell me more

Fox is a GOP mouthpiece, MSNBC is a Democrat mouthpiece. The 2 parties have their media outlets, you know that.

I didn't look at his link. I stopped looking at his links after the time I gave him the benefit of the doubt and tried to sit through a seven part series of absolute nonsense from an "engineer" about how the World Trade Center couldn't really be brought down by an airliner. Just like you with your endless runs of "innocent" questions, getting bogged down in any individual post is pointless.

Yes, I understand you dont like my questions but you should read Ritter's article. I mean, the implication is 'the establishment' does have it in for Trump.

 

[Timsup2nothin]

Yes, I understand you dont like my questions but you should read Ritter's article. I mean, the implication is 'the establishment' does have it in for Trump.

Of course "the establishment" has it in for Trump. That doesn't really say anything about "the establishment." Every human being with a conscience should have it in for Trump.

 

[red_elk]

Should, definitely. Has to? No, not really.

Must is a proper word. Dreams of grandeur can't go unpunished!

 

[Broken_Erika]

Consciences are for Commies!

 

[Lexicus]

Fox is a GOP mouthpiece, MSNBC is a Democrat mouthpiece. The 2 parties have their media outlets, you know that.

I didn't know that. It seems like if MSNBC were a Democrat mouthpiece they'd have spent less time talking about Benghazi and Hillary's emails but what do I know.

 

[Berzerker]

Of course "the establishment" has it in for Trump. That doesn't really say anything about "the establishment." Every human being with a conscience should have it in for Trump.

The end justifies the means

What did you do to MS?

 

[Berzerker]

How many people did Bill Clinton kill? Obama? Hillary? How many did they imprison? How many lives did they ruin? Why is it (some) Democrats only discover their conscience after a Republican wins the WH?

I didn't know that. It seems like if MSNBC were a Democrat mouthpiece they'd have spent less time talking about Benghazi and Hillary's emails but what do I know.

You didn't know Fox was a GOP mouthpiece or you're just talking about MSNBC? If you know MSNBC spent so much time talking about Benghazi and emails then you should know they were defending her from GOP outlets like Fox. Thats what party mouthpieces do, they attack the enemy and defend their party.