Team Fortress 2 Mafia: Game Thread [concluded]

[Mat93]

vote: Southernking

Zack I would point a finger at, but at his advice I will just leave it at saying I don't trust him right now, but I again would say that he probably isn't the best person to kill. As for his suggestion on takhisis, I have no reason to follow that as I don't trust him, and he might not even reveal his reason after the game. Combined with the post about 'revealing it would cause the game to descend into a flame-war' (not exact quote), I am not following that vote unless there is some actual good reason to vote takhisis.

Semi-related: Visorslash seems blue to me, simply by the fact that he is attempting to get inactives more involved, which won't help the red team at all.

 

[Jarrema]

vote: Southernking
Visorslash seems blue to me, simply by the fact that he is attempting to get inactives more involved, which won't help the red team at all.

But it can be a good strategy for mafia. Cheap way of seemingly being on town side

 

[RRRaskolnikov]

So far only one case looks reasonable and that is Zack's case on SouthernKing. vote:SouthernKing

Hey! that's my case!!! but anyway...

@Zack: I haven't received my explanation PM

edit: I am very disapointed in fact, since you appear to be brain-washing everyone in sight

vote: Southernking

Zack I would point a finger at, but at his advice I will just leave it

good times

 

[Skwink]

I'm gonna go SouthernKing today.

 

[JohannaK]

DING DING DING! We have a winner for the lynch today! (apparently)...

 

[Takhisis]

I'll abstain today.

 

[Verarde]

I'll abstain today.

You know, that might very well be the best course of action. I'll stick with BSmith though, he knows I love him,

 

[Takhisis]

I've just checked the rules and abstains are not allowed. What's the logic on SouthernKing? If someone can logically explain it to me I'll vote him.

But, please, don't lynch Zack just yet.

 

[Verarde]

The logic on SK, as near as I can tell, is that his votes have been back and forth, flipping here and there.

 

[Takhisis]

Then I'll vote for Omega124 to come out of his hidey-hole.

vote: Omega124

 

[Methos]

Visorslash seems blue to me, simply by the fact that he is attempting to get inactives more involved, which won't help the red team at all.

But it can be a good strategy for mafia. Cheap way of seemingly being on town side

It's a very good strategy and one I used very effectively as a wolf once [NOTW game]. BTW I won that game as a wolf.

 

[Mat93]

But it can be a good strategy for mafia. Cheap way of seemingly being on town side

True, it is only a feeling I get from it, although they are generally wrong.

good times

I never said I agree with him, I made it clear I was still suspicious of him, just went no further because I see no reason to right now. Give me a good reason not to trust him at all, if you think there is one. I don't trust him, or his reason for killing off takhisis, but that doesn't mean I see any reason to believe he is a red.

 

[DaveShack]

I guess I will vote: SouthernKing... your voting pattern is disturbing (switching votes faster than <well, insert something speedy here>).

Plus the way you follow Zack tells me that either you are his other account, or you know something that I don't.

edit: @Dave: what about your post last day (the scummy "whooo, I must allocate more time to this game"... followed by, well, no vote...)?

That "I must allocate more time" comment wasn't scummy at all. Normally about 5-10 posts can be expected between reading the thread, this time it was 3 pages, and the time I posted that it was another 3 IIRC. So it's an honest post, obviously the game is going to take more time than usual.

BTW, you edited a post with a vote in it. I haven't checked if you voted again since...

And I still haven't received any PMs. Very weird... Zack, perhaps you'd like to fill me in on the reason for voting Takhisis?

 

[DarthNader]

Seeing as how SouthernKing and Zack are both on my list of seemingly scummy individuals...and that Zack might be a Jester (which I'm still confused about, but still too concerned to ignore), I guess I'll vote: SouthernKing. He's pretty much lynched anyways, and he hasn't posted any defense of his actions.

 

[RRRaskolnikov]

I never said I agree with him, I made it clear I was still suspicious of him, just went no further because I see no reason to right now. Give me a good reason not to trust him at all, if you think there is one. I don't trust him, or his reason for killing off takhisis, but that doesn't mean I see any reason to believe he is a red.

I just found the wording funny... but that's me, don't take it personnally or anything.

edit: @Dave: I didn't edit the vote in. But maybe I am not getting that rule correctly. I won't edit such post in the future.

about your defense: if you say it wasn't scummy at all, it must be right!

 

[Zack]

No, no, no.

Takhisis is all but confirmed innocent.

SouthernKing is all but confirmed non-mafia, as is anyone else who has FoSed this game.

Is anyone actually reading what I'm saying?

 

[Zack]

And BSmith, freaking post already. You've been monitoring this thread like a hawk nonstop the last few days.

 

[Zack]

I strongly urge everyone to unvote SouthernKing and vote for me. If I must die and prove my innocence for people to believe me, I'll go ahead and take one for the team. It's that important.

 

[Zack]

Actually, nevermind. Let's kill two birds with one stone.

Unvote, Vote: SouthernKing

 

[RRRaskolnikov]

And BSmith, freaking post already. You've been monitoring this thread like a hawk nonstop the last few days.

You too apparently... I'd say he wins!