The Battle of Sekigahara

Flying Pig

Utrinque Paratus
Retired Moderator
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
15,651
Location
Perfidious Albion
The Battle of Sekigahara

Flying Pig

Sekigahara was the battle which confirmed the dominance of Tokugawa Ieyeasu over Japan. It was fought on 21 October 1600, in an area of Japan’s Gifu prefecture which is covered in valleys between the armies of Tokugawa Ieyeasu and Ishida Mitsunari; who were both locked in a struggle to dominate the whole island of Japan. What followed would, in no uncertain terms, decide the fate of a nation.

To understand the battle, it is essential to understand a little of Japanese culture at that time. The system in place for governing Japan was that parts of the archipelago (which was seen to be one country) were governed by different warrior aristocrats (who were technically subject to the Tennō, or Emperor, but in practise the most powerful aristocrat controlled him), who gave land to their best warriors in exchange for military service and tribute. In a manner similar to that of the feudal system in medieval Europe, these ‘knights’ or samurai then gave their land to peasants in exchange for their crops, enabling the samurai to focus totally on the arts of war and bushido, their incredibly strict code of honour. The difference, however, between the samurai of Japan and the knights of Europe was that the samurai were strictly a servant class; their duty in life was to serve and protect their lord.

Now, at that time Japanese warfare was fairly primitive. The chain of command was simply that the officers had sworn fealty to their immediate superior officer, but the nature of the terrain (especially at Sekigahara) meant that armies were divided into companies under small lords, generally from the same village or family, and these companies operated pretty much independently of the overall commander. They were governed by honour and the will to seek it out, and so battles were fought as a series of apparently random, small-scale attacks by individual companies in accordance with a very vague tactical plan. Weapons used by these soldiers varied; the samurai sword, or katana, was the close-combat weapon of choice for the lords, but most soldiers carried longbows, either on foot or on horseback; or long spears. Firearms had been brought in by European sailors, and so were availiable to soldiers, but due to the nature of them in the sixteenth century a unit firing had to remain in formation while reloading for a long time, so they were not common – emphasis was on weapons and tactics which could be used for rapid, mobile and autonomous action in the valleys and hills.

There was, in this system, constant infighting to be the most powerful of the lords, and thus rule Japan, or to establish their claim to ‘protect’ more and more land. By the end of the 16th century, the mightiest lords were Oda Nobunaga, Uesugi Kenshin, Toyotomi Hedeyoshi, Takeda Shingen, and Tokugawa Ieyasu. For the ten years before he was forced to commit suicide in 1583 (probably by the other lords, who disliked the idea of an emperor who actually wielded power) Oda Nobunaga practically controlled most of Japan, and upon his death Hideyoshi managed to take his position, ruling all of Japan except the northern island of Hokkaido, and setting up his capital in Kyoto. He died in 1598 with an infant son, and so named his five most powerful vassals as regents: Ieyasu, Maeda Toshiie, Uesugi Kagekatsu, Mori Terumoto and Ukita Hideie. Of course, these men resumed the old pattern of fighting to control the young lord.

Ieyasu, who had been sent by Hideyoshi to the Kanto plain around what is now Tokyo, got together the largest number of retainers (it was common practise for weaker lords to ally themselves with the stronger ones) while surviving the attention of rivals. In 1599, fuelled by the death of Maeda Toshiie, he moved into Osaka Castle (Hideyoshi’s seat of power) in a bid to make himself the master of the confederation, but was forced the next year to move most of his men back to Kanto, fearing an attack by Uesugi Kagekatsu, which allowed his enemies to bring 128000 men from western Japan to defeat him (as stated earlier, the lords were very wary of any one man becoming too powerful). In October of 1600 Ishida Mitsunari led these men around a mountain pass, known as Sekigahara, to block Ieyasu’s march home to Kyoto and Osaka. However, their plans at ambushing the lord failed, since he found out about them and so advanced on Sekigahara in good order to meet the enemy, with about 75000 men at his back.

What the Western Army defending the pass did not know was that one of its officers, a certain Kobayakawa Hideaki, had been convinced by Ieyasu by offers of land, wealth and position to betray his lord, as had a few other officers of the Western Army. This not only gave Ieyasu more soldiers, but a valuable trap which would spring, probably at a critical moment. One of the traitor lords also managed to convince another high-ranking Western Army officer to keep out of the battle.

Tokugawa Ieyasu attacked early on the 21st October and a melee sprung up, which continued at stalemate until the afternoon. The traitor Hideaki did not send in any of his troops until Ieyasu called in support from his musket-armed troops, which was taken as a signal, and Hideaki ordered his men to attack Mitsunari’s army. This forced Mitsunari himself to flee the battle, causing his men to surrender. It is important that had the men Ieyasu had convinced to betray their army instead attacked him, he would have faced almost certain defeat and been surrounded on three sides.

Ten days after the battle, Tokugawa Ieyasu marched his army, having lost 6000 men at the battle, into Osaka which made his claim to being the successor of Hideyoshi legitimate. He also had Mitsunari executed, and exiled almost all of the lords who had opposed him in the largest land reform in Japanese history, which caused him many enemities including one with the family of Hideyoshi, which he had to wait until 1615 to settle. In 1603 the Emperor named Ieyasu the Shogun, or highest-ranking military ruler, giving him supreme power over Japan with Imperial blessing, at which Ieyasu moved his capital to Edo (now Tokyo) on the eastern coast. The office remained with his descendants until 1867 and the abolition of the Shogunate. One of Ieyasu's first moves as Shogun was to ban the posession of firearms by peasants, since he knew that they threatened to uproot the social order and remove the rigid heiracy with the samurai above the peasants and the Shogun above the samurai.
 
Nice, very interesting. A little quibble on it as an essay, though- there's a few moments where it carries a somewhat informal tone, making it seem less professional. Things like "firearms were around then" sounds more like informal conversation than the more academic tone of an essay, so something like "firearms were available at the time" seems more suitable. I understand this wasn't intended as a formal essay, but I'd assume you're attempting to hone your skills as much as you can.
 
The most powerful lord controlled the emperor; that was why he was forced to commit suicide. I didn't know that; I've changed it.
 
Minor quibble:

For the ten years before he was forced to commit suicide in 1583 (probably by the other lords, who disliked the idea of an emperor who actually wielded power) Oda Nobunaga practically controlled most of Japan, and upon his death Hideyoshi managed to take his position, ruling all of Japan except the northern island of Hokkaido, and setting up his capital in Kyoto.

The northern island of Hokkaido wouldn't be considered part of Japan for at least another 286 years, so it would be more accurate to say that for all intents and purposes Hideyoshi ruled all of Japan.
 
The traitor Hideaki did not send in any of his troops until Ieyasu called in support from his rifles, which was taken as a signal, and Hideaki ordered his men to attack Mitsunari’s army. This forced Mitsunari himself to flee the battle, causing his men to surrender. It is important that had the men Ieyasu had convinced to betray their army instead attacked him, he would have faced almost certain defeat and been surrounded on three sides.[/FONT]

They would hardly have been rifles in 1600 - they would have been muskets, at best flintlocks, possibly even still matchlocks.

Also, I would have expected a bit more about the battle itself, seeing the title, especially on the use of firearms. AFAIK, this was the very first use of firearms in Japan in battle, at least on a significant scale. Also, I seem to remember that, immediately after the battle, owning firearms was prohibited to all, because they disturbed the hegemony of the samurai class... any peasant could fire a musket, after all.
That might make a nice tidbit for the article.

But interesting article, thanks!
 
I have read that there were ineed firearms used by tokugawa at this time, and that they were some of the best firearms of their time, with better accuracy than that of the european's, but after the end of the unification there were a ban on them to secure the hegemony of the samurai class and that of tokugawa i think.
 
I have read that there were ineed firearms used by tokugawa at this time, and that they were some of the best firearms of their time, with better accuracy than that of the european's, but after the end of the unification there were a ban on them to secure the hegemony of the samurai class and that of tokugawa i think.
There was no ban on firearms, merely an attempt by the state to control their use. The weapons themselves at the time of Sekigahara were, I think, matchlock firearms, and so not extremely advanced as compared to the European weapons of a similar time (IIRC).
 
About the Japanese "Tanegashima teppo", i.e. the "Tanegashima iron tubes":

In 1542 a Spanish ship was wrecked on the small Japanese island of Tanega(shima, meaning island), south of the island of Kyushu, the southernmost of the main islands. The local lord was presented with a musket by the rescued Spaniards.

Gunpowder being no real mystery to the Japanese, but the novel use did attract immediate attention. The weapon was brought to the mainland, taken apart, copied, and spread, this beginning shortly after 1542. And the Japanese didn't just copy, but set about tweaking these weapons. First of all they reduced the weight, which allowed them to do away with the supporting fork European muskets of the time came with. The firing mechanism wasn't a marvel of complexity, but the Japanese simplified it, without reducing efficiency. It has been said that doctrinally the Japanese and European expectations on their muskets differed; the Europeans were very much concerned with trying to increase rate of fire (they did have rifling, meaning precision, but kept to the smooth-bore since loading time was quicker), while the Japanese worked on increasing accuracy. Which was the better, I wouldn't want to say. Properly used, both were deadly. What the Japanese lacked was artillery though.

First probably substantial use of muskets by Japanese forces would seem to be by Oda Nobunaga in the 1560's making his first bid for the capital.

What really sold musketry to the Japanese commanders, how effective it could really be when used properly, was the battle of Nagashino, 1575, when Nobunaga, supported by his main general (later successor) Hideyoshi, and ally Tokugawa Ieyasu, utterly destroyed the battle hardened army of the Takeda clan. (Oh, and anyone thinking Japanese tactics were "primitive" should probably take a peak at the series of engagements fought by legendary commander Takeda Shingen against his main rival in eastern Japan, Uesugi Kenshin.)

Lots of discussion on exactly how Nobunaga deployed his 2000 crack musketeers, including the assumption that he invented volley firing a couple of decades ahead of the Europeans. The latest word I've seen is not so, but that he amped up his firepower by having 6000 loaders servicing his musketeers, i.e. deploying the concentrated fire of 8000 muskets on the Takeda. I still think you get a decent idea of what ensued from the climactic battle sequence in Kurosawa's "Kagemusha". It has been asked why the Takedas walked into that lead storm the way they did. The most reasonable explanation I've seen was that they were hoping the general damp weather would reduce the efficiency of the musketeers, since it had been raining the day before. This was very much a concern for European armies of the period as well.

The stunning effect of Nobunaga's musketeers was at least such that Hideyoshi and Ieyasu took the lesson very much to heart. When fighting a series of engagements over leadership after Nobunaga's murder, both made sure not to expose their troops to anything like the withering fire the other side could lay down, meaning you got a form of oddly static warfare, both sides ducking for cover and digging in.

Having settled the succession peacefully (Hideyoshi becoming generalissimo, or Kwampaku), large numbers of musketeers were employed in the attempted conquest of Korea in the 1580-90's.

Which cronologically brings the story up to Sekigahara.

Muskets were produced during the Tokugawa period as well. As I recall it, the manufacture was a privilege of a small number of specially trusted artisan families, and development pretty much ground to a halt. (Though the Dutch-scholars the Shogunate kept on its payroll, scholars with language skills in Dutch and Latin, did make special efforts to get hold of European treatises on military technology and tactics.)

Anyway, there apparently was a saying during the Edo period, that if some lord residing in the capital was planning rebellion, the tell-tale sign to look for was "De onna, iri teppo", women going out, guns coming in.
 
About the Japanese "Tanegashima teppo", i.e. the "Tanegashima iron tubes":

In 1542 a Spanish ship was wrecked on the small Japanese island of Tanega(shima, meaning island), south of the island of Kyushu, the southernmost of the main islands. The local lord was presented with a musket by the rescued Spaniards.

:mad: again that recurring confusion!

It wasn't a spanish ship, and it probably wasn't 1542. It was probably in 1543, and it may have been a chinese pirate junk which also carried 3 portuguese adventurers and docked at Tanegashima after escaping pursuit by other pirates.
I know of two western accounts purporting to describe that first meeting: one is in chapters 132-137 of "Peregrinacam" (Peregrinação, pub. 1614) and even gives a name for this accidental introducer of a an arquebus, Diogo Zeimoto. I'm inclined to believe it. The reliability of the author of that book, Mendes Pinto, has been questioned for centuries, but even if he made up his own presence at the occasion he was probably retelling the story he had heard about that first contact. He was certainly somewhere in the East, and went to Japan again after 1543; the rest of his book doesn't seem inaccurate about places, events, and dates, only the author's role is questioned.
The other is by Antonio Galvano, published in 1555 (edit: 1557 - if I'm being pedantic I should get the dates right :D), and also mentions Zeimoto. Who copied who, or who provided the original story for both, is lost.

That whole book really is interesting.
 
They would hardly have been rifles in 1600 - they would have been muskets, at best flintlocks, possibly even still matchlocks.

Also, I would have expected a bit more about the battle itself, seeing the title, especially on the use of firearms. AFAIK, this was the very first use of firearms in Japan in battle, at least on a significant scale. Also, I seem to remember that, immediately after the battle, owning firearms was prohibited to all, because they disturbed the hegemony of the samurai class... any peasant could fire a musket, after all.
That might make a nice tidbit for the article.

But interesting article, thanks!

Thanks about rifles; that's me thinking in terms of man-carried gun = rifle. The battle was simply a melee till miodday, then Ieyasu opened up and it all finished quite fast.
 
Back
Top Bottom