The Great Flood

Status
Not open for further replies.

Berzerker

Deity
Joined
Dec 30, 2000
Messages
21,785
Location
the golf course
https://phys.org/news/2018-02-ice-age-human-witnessed-larger.html

A 62 mile wide comet broke up with chunks hitting the Earth 12,800 years ago... The resulting fires burned 10% of the land sending us back into an ice age - the Younger Dryas - for 1,000 years. If some of these comet fragments hit oceans the tsunamis would have been enormous and may have given rise to flood myths around the world.

The research is being done by people at the Universities of Kansas (Lawrence) and Washburn here in Topeka. :)

According to them the fires were even worse than the calamity causing the dinosaur extinction.

On a ho-hum day some 12,800 years ago, the Earth had emerged from another ice age. Things were warming up, and the glaciers had retreated.

Out of nowhere, the sky was lit with fireballs. This was followed by shock waves.

Fires rushed across the landscape, and dust clogged the sky, cutting off the sunlight. As the climate rapidly cooled, plants died, food sources were snuffed out, and the glaciers advanced again. Ocean currents shifted, setting the climate into a colder, almost "ice age" state that lasted an additional thousand years.

A Tlingit (Alaska) Indian myth dates the Great Flood to 14,000 years ago and the Atlantis myth describes its destruction 11,600 years ago. This 12,800 date is squarely between them.
 
https://phys.org/news/2018-02-ice-age-human-witnessed-larger.html

A 62 mile wide comet broke up with chunks hitting the Earth 12,800 years ago... The resulting fires burned 10% of the land sending us back into an ice age - the Younger Dryas - for 1,000 years. If some of these comet fragments hit oceans the tsunamis would have been enormous and may have given rise to flood myths around the world.

The research is being done by people at the Universities of Kansas (Lawrence) and Washburn here in Topeka. :)

According to them the fires were even worse than the calamity causing the dinosaur extinction.



A Tlingit (Alaska) Indian myth dates the Great Flood to 14,000 years ago and the Atlantis myth describes its destruction 11,600 years ago. This 12,800 date is squarely between them.
This is still not going to convince me that either Noah's flood or Atlantis were real.
 
Noah's Flood makes not only extraordinary claims, but logically absurd ones... That doesn't mean the world's flood myths aren't based on some event that gave rise to them. I've long suspected they tied in with the end of the ice age when seas rose hundreds of feet, but this research suggests it was tsunamis and not sea rise that inspired the Flood myth.

If the impacts caused the Younger Dryas, and that resulted in a return to ice age conditions, then sea rise was not the culprit for the Flood. A cometary impact would account for the deluge though in addition to tsunamis, a massive influx of water vapor into the atmosphere would have drenched the planet and might have actually lessened the firestorm.
 
https://phys.org/news/2018-02-ice-age-human-witnessed-larger.html

A 62 mile wide comet broke up with chunks hitting the Earth 12,800 years ago... The resulting fires burned 10% of the land sending us back into an ice age - the Younger Dryas - for 1,000 years. If some of these comet fragments hit oceans the tsunamis would have been enormous and may have given rise to flood myths around the world.

The research is being done by people at the Universities of Kansas (Lawrence) and Washburn here in Topeka. :)

According to them the fires were even worse than the calamity causing the dinosaur extinction.



A Tlingit (Alaska) Indian myth dates the Great Flood to 14,000 years ago and the Atlantis myth describes its destruction 11,600 years ago. This 12,800 date is squarely between them.
Such an impact event may have happened; the science behind the article is not outlandish. The problem, of course, is linking it to written records made 10,000 years later. Can an oral history be kept going for 10,000 years? I think that is unlikely. Can you provide an example of an oral history that can be shown to be over 1000 years long?
 
Real as in actually happened. Floods in general happen. Noah's flood still lacks evidence. Ditto Atlantis.
This does not answer the question. I suspect you are trying to say that the drowning of Atlantis and Noah's flood is are dramatizations of a much smaller floods, rather than personified recollections of an event that involved the whole geographic region.

I always liked the flooding of the Red or Black Sea as the source. Those are actual floods which could supply the factual basis for either or both stories. However, a global event, such as a comet strike has virtue as well.

Such an impact event may have happened; the science behind the article is not outlandish. The problem, of course, is linking it to written records made 10,000 years later. Can an oral history be kept going for 10,000 years? I think that is unlikely. Can you provide an example of an oral history that can be shown to be over 1000 years long?
The South Pacific tribes have oral traditions of European landings 500 years old, which track closely with ship documentation. For scale, Magellan was 1520-1522. Francis Drake was 1577-1580. 1000 years is not that long for a society with good mnemonics.

J
 
Last edited:
Such an impact event may have happened; the science behind the article is not outlandish. The problem, of course, is linking it to written records made 10,000 years later. Can an oral history be kept going for 10,000 years? I think that is unlikely. Can you provide an example of an oral history that can be shown to be over 1000 years long?

Yes... According to the myths of the coastal Indians of Southern Alaska their ancestors were forced from their inland homes by the ice sheet - the glacial maximum was ~22-18kya. They settled along the coast prior to the Flood in a region that saw sea rise matched by tectonic rebound (called a hinge I think) as the ice sheet melted away, ie their homes didn't become submerged by rising seas because the land rose too. Researchers have found their homes on those coastal islands dating back over 10,000 years ago. The Tlingit are among these peoples and their Flood myth dates to 14,000 years.

According to Genesis the 'curse' placed on Eve was increased pain in child birth. The research shows this happened over 100kya, maybe even 200kya - thats when sapien women began suffering more from child birth in comparison to their erectus ancestors. Now regarding this myth, that may not be evidence of an oral tradition lasting that long because it was God who informed Adam and Eve of this curse. Yet an event that happened up to 200,000 years ago appears in the Bible, however it got there.
 
This does not answer the question. I suspect you are trying to say that the drowning of Atlantis and Noah's flood is are dramatizations of a much smaller floods, rather than personified recollections of an event that involved the whole geographic region.

I always liked the flooding of the Red or Black Sea as the source. Those are actual floods which could supply the factual basis for either or both stories. However, a global event, such as a comet strike has virtue as well.

J
She answered your question. That you don't like or agree with it doesn't mean she didn't answer it.
 
Can you provide an example of an oral history that can be shown to be over 1000 years long?

From Wikipedia:
"Those who believe that the stories of the Trojan War are derived from a specific historical conflict usually date it to the 12th or 11th centuries BC, often preferring the dates given by Eratosthenes, 1194–1184 BC, which roughly corresponds with archaeological evidence of a catastrophic burning of Troy VIIa"

I've also seen a theory tying Noah's Flood to the breaking of the land barrier connecting Asia & Europe, allowing sea water flood into the "Black Sea Depression."

During the last of the great glaciations, the Black Sea became a large freshwater lake. The present connection to the Mediterranean Sea—and to salt water—is believed to have emerged some 6,500 to 7,500 years ago.
 
I dont know how or why they think the comet was ~62 miles wide, I suppose it has to do with the widespread evidence of its effects. But we didn't know how large the asteroid (?) that took out the dinos was until they found the crater off the Yucatan. Well, they can estimate its size from how much stuff was deposited I guess, like the iridium layer it left behind.

I dont see any mention of craters from this comet, but our knowledge of the sea floor is not as thorough. Plus a comet breaking up might not leave craters on the seafloor, a half mile wide chunk of comet might not leave much of a noticeable scar after hitting a 2-3 mile deep patch of water.

But we should be finding craters on land assuming this object did break up into several or a dozen fragments like Shoemaker Levy hitting Jupiter. Less dense impactors like a comet might not reach the surface, but still... On the other hand, a comet chunk striking a 3 mile thick ice sheet wouldn't leave a crater in the land, evidence of the impact would have melted away.
 
This does not answer the question. I suspect you are trying to say that the drowning of Atlantis and Noah's flood is are dramatizations of a much smaller floods, rather than personified recollections of an event that involved the whole geographic region.

I always liked the flooding of the Red or Black Sea as the source. Those are actual floods which could supply the factual basis for either or both stories. However, a global event, such as a comet strike has virtue as well.
I answered your question. There is no evidence that Noah's flood, as described in Genesis, really happened.

There is no evidence that Atlantis ever existed.


Yes... According to the myths of the coastal Indians of Southern Alaska their ancestors were forced from their inland homes by the ice sheet - the glacial maximum was ~22-18kya. They settled along the coast prior to the Flood in a region that saw sea rise matched by tectonic rebound (called a hinge I think) as the ice sheet melted away, ie their homes didn't become submerged by rising seas because the land rose too. Researchers have found their homes on those coastal islands dating back over 10,000 years ago. The Tlingit are among these peoples and their Flood myth dates to 14,000 years.

According to Genesis the 'curse' placed on Eve was increased pain in child birth. The research shows this happened over 100kya, maybe even 200kya - thats when sapien women began suffering more from child birth in comparison to their erectus ancestors. Now regarding this myth, that may not be evidence of an oral tradition lasting that long because it was God who informed Adam and Eve of this curse. Yet an event that happened up to 200,000 years ago appears in the Bible, however it got there.
Could you please leave your Adam and Eve fantasies out of things, even just once?
 
The South Pacific tribes have oral traditions of European landings 500 years old, which track closely with ship documentation. For scale, Magellan was 1520-1522. Francis Drake was 1577-1580. 1000 years is not that long for a society with good mnemonics.

J
Ok, 500 years is along time, but made much easier since that tradition began within our historical period. But 500 years is not 10,000 and during that 10,000 there were no modern influences that either aided or encouraged preservation.

Yes... According to the myths of the coastal Indians of Southern Alaska their ancestors were forced from their inland homes by the ice sheet - the glacial maximum was ~22-18kya. They settled along the coast prior to the Flood in a region that saw sea rise matched by tectonic rebound (called a hinge I think) as the ice sheet melted away, ie their homes didn't become submerged by rising seas because the land rose too. Researchers have found their homes on those coastal islands dating back over 10,000 years ago. The Tlingit are among these peoples and their Flood myth dates to 14,000 years.

According to Genesis the 'curse' placed on Eve was increased pain in child birth. The research shows this happened over 100kya, maybe even 200kya - thats when sapien women began suffering more from child birth in comparison to their erectus ancestors. Now regarding this myth, that may not be evidence of an oral tradition lasting that long because it was God who informed Adam and Eve of this curse. Yet an event that happened up to 200,000 years ago appears in the Bible, however it got there.
A couple of things. First I looked for Tlingit myths related to what you posted and could not find anything. Please post a link to the specific myths you mentioned. I found lots of Raven Tales and one non Raven Tale about how they traveled under the ice to find their way to the coast from inland. No mention of being forced to do so, but there may be other versions of the same move. Second, there is no way to figure out when a myth event takes place (ie, how far back in the past) unless some verifiable event can be documented and tied to the mythology. The filling of the Black Sea is an event that people have tried to link to flood myths. How do you defend your notion that the words in a story can be linked to a geologic upland of land 10,000 years ago? that is why I'd like to see the particular stories you say are 10,000 years old.

Thanks.
 
I just remembered more examples of oral traditions that lasted a long time, the people of Flores have legends about the little people of the forest who lived long ago. These legends may be speaking of the 'Hobbits' of Flores. New research suggests they're even more archaic than erectus, maybe pithecines. The dates are still in flux but there may have been an overlap with modern humans ~50,000 years ago and they subsequently went extinct just like all the other peoples in our way.

The Zulu have a myth about their ancestors (called 'the artificial ones') waging wars on the 'apemen' and other people around the world have myths about earlier more primitive peoples. One of the Mesoamerican myths speaks of the monkey people who were destroyed for their inability to properly serve the gods. That sounds very much like the Zulu myth and the Sumerian reference to a creature roaming the south who was given the likeness of the gods.

Other myths describe earlier humans who were replaced by 'us', even the Garden story depicts a progression in the first humans. Adam was naked and unashamed seeking a mate from among the other animals and partakes from the tree of knowledge, maybe thats where Arthur C Clarke got his idea for the monolith. Eve's curse is evidence of a tradition going back maybe 200,000 years. Although some research disputes that, its possible the increased pain women suffer in child birth may be partly or mostly the result of agriculture.

Another biblical tradition says the Adam was taken eastward to the Eden. Lying west of the Persian Gulf is Ethiopia and 200,000 year old sapiens. Its possible this tradition was born that long ago when we probably were in one place with one language, and one common mythology. God told us to spread out, that suggests we were created in one location and did just that.

Could you please leave your Adam and Eve fantasies out of things, even just once?

I was asked to provide examples of long-lived traditions and the Bible contains several starting with Adam and Eve.

Ok, 500 years is along time, but made much easier since that tradition began within our historical period. But 500 years is not 10,000 and during that 10,000 there were no modern influences that either aided or encouraged preservation.

Unless they wrote it down it was still an oral tradition, but 500 years aint nothing. If we could speak 200,000 years ago and lived in close proximity back then, we've been maintaining oral traditions a looong time. I'd argue our shared cosmologies go back that far, the sky was the source of that commonality. As we split up and migrated about the world much was forgotten or amended by new experiences, but the sky dont change much.

A couple of things. First I looked for Tlingit myths related to what you posted and could not find anything. Please post a link to the specific myths you mentioned. I found lots of Raven Tales and one non Raven Tale about how they traveled under the ice to find their way to the coast from inland. No mention of being forced to do so, but there may be other versions of the same move. Second, there is no way to figure out when a myth event takes place (ie, how far back in the past) unless some verifiable event can be documented and tied to the mythology. The filling of the Black Sea is an event that people have tried to link to flood myths. How do you defend your notion that the words in a story can be linked to a geologic upland of land 10,000 years ago? that is why I'd like to see the particular stories you say are 10,000 years old.

Thanks.

The Tlingit Flood myth dating it to 14,000 years ago appeared on a PBS docu on killer whales. An old man speaking in his tongue was talking about Orca traditions and out of the blue mentioned the Great Flood happening 14,000 years ago. That docu's gotta be 20 years old by now. I'll look for the migration myth, I posted it in another thread (A Human Paradox?). An update on that one, researchers have found modern human fossils in Israel dating back 175,000 years. Thats so bizarre, we're in Israel that long ago and took another 125-135,000 to reach Europe?

As for the Black Sea flood, it undoubtedly had a profound effect on the people living there, but that flood was the result of rising seas as the ice melted - that was happening to coastal peoples all over (except for the few living on hinges and even they have a flood myth). But we haven't really found a great flood in the melt record. Yes, there were spurts of sea rise but the myths speak of a unique situation, whatever caused the Younger Dryas might be it. A comet breaking up, exploding, impacting, etc... Tsunamis, a deluge of rain, but something that doesn't necessarily show up as a massive sudden rise in sea levels. Something masked by the return to ice age conditions and a drop in sea levels.

edit: the link to the migration myth caught my attention because its being cited in court by coastal Indians backed by archaeological finds. But I cant find it on google, I'm sure I posted it here though, I just dont know what thread.
 
Last edited:
I don’t have much to offer except that robust oral traditions lose nearly zero information in their transmission, and drawing from all the peoples of the world it would not be unreasonable that an oral history or two made it thousands of years unimpeded.
 
Women having increased pain during childbirth was likely partly due to humans learning to walk upright, and the long process of restructuring of the hips to do so through evolution. It has nothing to do with a curse or anything other metaphysical nonsense. It is simple biology. While Homo Erectus women may have apparently had less pain in childbirth (how do we know this anyway?), it may be because their hips were not completely fully formed to the state and structure that they are now in Homo Sapien women. Evolution is a long process and it takes a very long time for a gene mutation to become selected and phased into the species. I'd have to bust out my medical books and really look hard to find the supporting information for this hip thing, but I do recall something from my anthropology/human biology classes about it in university. It's late and I don't feel like doing it now, or even in the morning, but I'm sure that someone will look this up anyway.

Oh, and childbirth hurts no matter if you're a human, or a dog, or a monkey, or a zebra. The dilation, and the ripping and tearing is hard on the female, no matter the species. Watch an animal give birth some time. It hurts them just as much as it hurts a human female. I have a friend who describes the experience as similar to "trying to pass a football out of your butt." She would know. She's had three children.
 
I was asked to provide examples of long-lived traditions and the Bible contains several starting with Adam and Eve.
So this is just an excuse to regurgitate all that stuff from previous threads, apparently.

Adam and Eve have NOTHING to do with any floods. Floods are supposedly the topic of this thread.

Unless they wrote it down it was still an oral tradition, but 500 years aint nothing. If we could speak 200,000 years ago and lived in close proximity back then, we've been maintaining oral traditions a looong time. I'd argue our shared cosmologies go back that far, the sky was the source of that commonality. As we split up and migrated about the world much was forgotten or amended by new experiences, but the sky dont change much.
Oh, yes, it most certainly does.

Our solar system is constantly on the move, and so are the other stars. Given enough time, constellations don't look anything like they did before.

There's an episode of the original Cosmos series in which Carl Sagan talks about this (starts approximately 3:30 minutes in):

 
Women having increased pain during childbirth was likely partly due to humans learning to walk upright, and the long process of restructuring of the hips to do so through evolution. It has nothing to do with a curse or anything other metaphysical nonsense. It is simple biology. While Homo Erectus women may have apparently had less pain in childbirth (how do we know this anyway?), it may be because their hips were not completely fully formed to the state and structure that they are now in Homo Sapien women. Evolution is a long process and it takes a very long time for a gene mutation to become selected and phased into the species. I'd have to bust out my medical books and really look hard to find the supporting information for this hip thing, but I do recall something from my anthropology/human biology classes about it in university. It's late and I don't feel like doing it now, or even in the morning, but I'm sure that someone will look this up anyway.

Oh, and childbirth hurts no matter if you're a human, or a dog, or a monkey, or a zebra. The dilation, and the ripping and tearing is hard on the female, no matter the species. Watch an animal give birth some time. It hurts them just as much as it hurts a human female. I have a friend who describes the experience as similar to "trying to pass a football out of your butt." She would know. She's had three children.
I've heard that increased cranium size to accommodate our big fancy brains is also at play here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom