swimming would theoretically be the exact same event with or without the swimsuit.
That would make for some x-rated coverage. They do underwater shots with the cameras, after all.
Swimsuits don't cause you can swim naked just fine.
You could, but one reason for the skin-tight covering, including the head, is to minimize the amount of drag and resistance the athlete has (whether competing in the open air or underwater). They don't want anything impeding this, and since certain anatomical parts don't lie flat on the human body unless said human is lying on their back, having them swim naked would be detrimental to their time (when you get into thousandths of seconds, that's why they want every speed advantage possible).
I've been watching random olympic events since the 90s if not the 80s. Pole vault, ice hockey, volleyball, figure skating, curling, ping pong, cycling, etc. I oppose the IOC and their corrupt ways but I do enjoy watching athletes square off against each other, especially if it's the top athletes from around the planet
I fully agree that the IOC has been corrupt for a very long time. I'm glad that you've watched a wide variety of events.
I've got no patience with curling. It's huge in some parts of Canada, and the elite tournaments are very popular. I just don't understand the appeal, though. It must be one of those things that you have to be part of it or know someone involved for it to be interesting.
Kinda like pony chucks, except in curling, no animals are harmed.
It would not be the same televised sport
Definitely NSFW.
Funnily enough the ballroom dancing governing body the WDSF is the one that had itself declared also the governing body for breaking so they could get access to the Olympics that way, after ballroom kept getting rejected.
They identified breaking as something decentralised and basically ungoverned (local scenes ran themselves, event organisers largely set the conditions unilaterally), and something with the youth orientation the IOC would be amenable to including, and just took over. Breaking was basically there because ballroom wasn't wanted.
Ballroom dancing is seen as some sort of snobby elite thing. And I suppose it is, when you get to the elite levels. For ordinary people, though, some of those dances are just what people were expected to know, to be considered "socially normal". We had dance lessons in my high school gym classes, when the girls' class and boys' class were merged for a few days and the gym teachers tried to teach us to dance.
About all I remember from back then was how to do the hustle (hey, it was the '70s; of course they taught us disco). I also remember some square dances from our dance classes in elementary. And of course I learned some medieval dances in the SCA.
Waltzing, though? It's beyond me. The Butterfly is about all I learned of the social dances my grandmother wanted me to learn.
Breakdancing, though, is something that isn't seen as some snobby thing. So it's more accessible to both competitors and viewers.