Although, I would claim that you, Niklas, didn't really get nothing out of what you wanted. The church did prove its durability, for instance, and most of the "demon-cults" within the territories under Neo-Akkadian control had been eliminated by now. The various military advances were likewise made, with new advanced anti-cavalry weapons and tactics. So it isn't as simple as that, though naturally, an elaborate plan that fails to account for time and the unexpected can generally be worse than a more simplistic and ambigous one, especially in a BT, where we have a particularily long amount of time.
Indeed. What I said was an overstatement, it was said in affect and frustration. My appologies for that.
I didn't get nothing - I just didn't get the one thing that I truly cared about for my future plans of the area. I didn't mind being conquered, I don't mind the successor states, and I'm glad the church is strong. But these things are only temporary matters, the state of the area will change so much over the next BT updates that it matters little. The one thing that mattered most, and that I truly worked hard to achieve - the missionary efforts - were shrugged off as largely unsuccessful, and that's what frustrated me. But re-reading the update, all may not be lost. Expect a bunch of questions some time later.
I'm the Frisii.
What should I gather from the fact that everyone seems to think that my nation is NPC?
I think it's simply the fact that you have made no public claims or mentions of it. How could we possibly tell a PC and an NPC nation apart just by reading the update?
[rant] I'd just like to take this opportunity to say that I'm unimpressed with the current stance most players seem to take to diplomacy. I've been told on more than one occasion "sorry, it's not feasible that our nations be talking, we don't know you exist." I'm not trying to contact the Incas in Southern America I'm trying to have a diplomatic talk with a nation that resides somewhere on the other side of the Europe and whats more has an adequate coastline! Diplomats by 400AD were spread all over Europe and indeed the world (as I'm sure Das could attest to). The ship and the horse were powerful tools of transportation. If I was to get in a ship and attempt to get from Constantinople to Britain in 400AD the max, absolute max it would take me is one year with adequate ports to resupply at. Considering that each of Das' updates cover 400 years how the hell is it unfeasible that I create diplomatic treaties with a nation on the Italian mainland or even the British islands? I think either some nations in this NES are run by incompetent tuna fish or some people are seriously underestimating the capabilities of mankind at 400AD. We had rather sophisticated technology. If my people can understand the mechanics of an aqueduct I'm sure planning a six-month sea voyage wouldn't be a problem *MAJOR SIGH* [/rant]
There are a number of things that I think are behind this. First and foremost, this is the BT part of the game. Diplomatic ties are not really something we're expected to play with, and in particular, well-coordinated plans don't really make sense since das could thwart everything a century later. Also, while it would certainly be
possible to sail from Greece to Britain in the 400s, the question is what the point is. Merchants might brave that trip to make a profit, but diplomatic ties wouldn't be very useful. In those days, diplomatic ties was something you had with those you might otherwise be risking a war with. What kind of diplomacy could Greece possibly have to offer Britain? "Let's not fight"? Big chance for that anyway. "Let's ally against X"? Coordination efforts would be impossible when a one-way trip is several months at best. And of course also what I said about BTs.
This is a great game but people are making it REALLY hard to achieve even the most base diplomatic aims. If you all want to concentrate on your tiny spheres of the world then fine. But Hessonia is not content to do so. We will expand our horizons ever further for the glory of the empire. Not just militarily but commercially and diplomatically. I implore all diplomatically minded nations to open communications with me so we can start working on treaties to make the world a better place. Enough senseless destruction has been caused by lack of communication and pointless war. We shall still have war but war with a purpose, righteous war. Look to the stars and say not today, not tomorrow but one day they will be mine.
This is exactly what I'm talking about. To say that Hessonia isn't content to sit back and rest is a statement in the now. Any treaties signed will probably be honored for a few decades at most, until the next ruler comes along with megalomanial tendencies, or the next barbaric invasion that puts everything on its head. The next BT is going to span a few hundred years, and in that time it's not even certain that Hessonia will exist! In fact, chances are really great that it won't, judging by history. What nations in the 400s were still around 300 years later? The BTs are simply too long, too uncertain, too wide in scope for treaties and similar detailed issues to make any real sense.
So, trying to make a long story short, diplomatic ties are great and all, but at this point it only really makes sense between neighbors, and only in the broad sense. Just wait until the game starts for real, only two more BTs to go.
ps. I'm your neighbor and didn't get any diplomacy, should I be worried?
