Well I consider it a fairly strange game. The only rounds that will matter will be the last few rounds. I was thinking the most reasonable rule would be to say you cannot post until 5 people have posted after your previous post. It would make the endgame interesting.
Actually, I think a cool game would be to put our own names in place of the leaders, and have the rule that you cannot save yourself. Rather than saving some leader who we're simply 'rooting' for, we'd be playing to survive. I'm not sure how the last rounds would work though, and in this game it would be more important to have rules about the order of players posting. Give me a bit of time and I might post another game along these lines. Though I'd hate to pull the attention away from this game if Danielos doesn't want that.
EDIT. Ok I said I wouldn't but I did. I have started a new thread with the signup for a new game I called Diplomilation for the moment. Participants in this thread will hopefully signup!
However, the more I play it the more I can see the flaws as you mentioned. I agree there should be more rules and restrictions on this game to make it fun. Substituting leaders for ourselves doesn´t make sense though. What do I know about you guys that would make me vote on one rather than the other?? 
)
