1- Theocratic Freedom: Ottoman Empire before 1850s. State religion matters only in foreign relations and missionaries. Citizens have freedom of religion, but they have to obey the laws of their own religions in the society. Citizens can't be secular in this. A Theocracy trying to get the

bonus of Free Religion, or Free Religion trying to base itself on religious teachings?
2- State Sanctioned Atheism: USSR and other communists. No state religion, no freedom of religion, no religious building counstruction etc.
3- Ideological or Personal Cult: WW2 Germany, Turkmenistan. No state religion, but people can have religion. May be a subset of #4.
4- Strong Secularism: Turkey, France. Religion is free, but it is not allowed to affect citizens in neither personal nor societal scale.
5- Freedom of Faith: Many developed countries. Religion is free, people can do whatever they want with their life. Religion is only prohibited from affecting foreign relations.
6- Unbalanced Freedom: USA. Religion is free, but with unbalanced demographics of religion. The country's policies are often influenced by religion and the state almost has a state religion. This is a more secular and modern version of #1. This has the happy of the Free Religion civic without all the science bonus (look at all the fuss about stem cell research).
Keep in mind that even if you disagree with my assessment of one of the countries I gave as example, don't waste your breath on argueing against it, as individual countries aren't our topic. Just replace the name of the country with Exampleland and re-think about it.