The War on Terrorism

[Nexushyper]

Afghanistan is wrong place!!!

 

[Cashie]

Go to your room and think about what you've just done!!

Sorrry, dude. It needs a lot of work.

 

[Benderino]

You must include Pakistan and India for the war on Terror. Pakistan is needed for the Afghani theater, and then India is needed to balance them.

 

[Panzer_Blitz]

This scenario could use another week in development, I hate it when people release things too soon.

 

[ColinSuperCool]

I agree your scenario needs a little work my advice to you would be to put less resources on the map fix that lake thing in Bulgaria and a lot less railroads especially in Afghanistan (I don’t think they have even one to begin with) but overall I think your scenario has lots of potential.

 

[kirinichibang]

Why don'T you all shut up ... this scenario is great and need some respect .
If you think that something is wrong .. well, just chane it and post the update dammm!

 

[Sims2789]

Since when has Iraq supported terroism against the US, and since when have they been part of the War on Terror? For this, I voted it terrible. Simply because I hate it when Bushists claim that Saddam was linked to Al Qaeda, yet when ever I ask for evidence, they just repeat themselves like a broken record, babbling the six infamous words of: "Saddam was linked to Al Qaeda..."

 

[Sims2789]

Also, if you are claiming a terrorist to be any evil despotic regime, another thing Bushists like to do, then make Saudi Arabia a terrorist nation (And Jordan, and Iran, etc.). They are worse than Saddam ever was. At least he let women get medical care without the consent of the oldest male in the household. Then again, the Bush Administration, with his links to Halliburton, usually makes an exemption for Saudi Arabia.

 

[emzie]

Afghanistan is close; it'd look better with Pakistan -- a country that should be here. It'd also look better if it's western boarder didn't extend so far; where it does now is part of Iran (just lower Chakcharan's culture). The country should also have very few roads and no railroads.

To represent the American’s use of Diego Garcia, you might want to give the US a fleet in the Arabian Sea… a carrier with a few stealth bombers.

I'd also add the Northern Alliance.

 

[kirinichibang]

ya heard it 1st here on civfanatics.com

 

[mintyfreshdeath]

I suspect a warning is coming sooner or later from one of the forum moderators with concern to Sims2789's 2 posts. Probably not a good idea to let things turn into a political debate.. however, when someone makes a scenario like this it IS political. :/
Unfortunately, to not talk about is political too.

 

[Epimethius]

First of all, I don't have C3C, so this isn't all too informed.

Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrein, Qatar, and Kabul have to go to the US. Not....Sudan.....

Civ being a realist game, this gets a bit hard.

One thing to do would be allow various states to make priveteer-like Terrorist units, which would be like cannons with defense. They wouldn't have national markings, and they'd bombard, but they would also not be capturable and be able to defend and attack directly.

Najaf and Falluja could be given to an Insurgents civ or something, with insurgent nationals in other cities. Most of Afghanistan shouldn't be under the US, but it could be under some terrorist state, as could Waziristan or whatever its called in Pakistan. Palestine could be seperate from Isreal (both of which would obviously have to exist) and have Gaza and Ramallah or something.

 

[ByzantineGreek]

Version 2 is in the works but the reason Iraq and other countries got cities was to make it more "fair". I've looked at the boundaries and will lower Chackaran's culture. Also, Pakistan and many of the former Soviet States, Oman, and India will be added. I'll redo the Oil and Road/Railroad problem.

@Sims: The reason Iraq is in the "Terrorist Countries" is because it is rumored to have Weapons of Mass Destruction and is home to many terror syndicates and at present it is independent but since this scenario starts in 2002 it isn't so bug off until Version 2.0 comes out!

 

[Branoic]

"Rumoured to have Weapons of Mass Destruction"
LOL

Rumoured to have lots of oil, more like

 

[silver 2039]

I'll play it once you add India.

 

[Mr Funkypants]

Not very good. First of all, America should be neither in Sudan nor Saudi Arabia. The Saudis America is mostly allied with yes, but from which nation did more than half of Al Qaeda come? Saudi Arabia of course! And Sudan is just a land in a terrible civil war against anything that they don't think is perfect. (including all Westerners) Give America Kuwait, Jordan, and if needed, Israel. That will work a lot better. Sure, they wouldn't be as powerful, but just give 'em a hell of a big military. Add Pakistan and India, and Kazachstan of course. Exclude the "terrorist nations", change it to
"pro-US Arab Nations" and "anti-US Arab Nations" That will work a lot better. That way people don't call you a stupid American who can't see past his nose and believes everything to be in black and white.

~Funky~

For the rest it isn't bad.

 

[navman74]

Ok, not a bad scenario. BTW Saddam did fund terror attacks in/against Israel, so was at the very least connected with some terror grps. Also gassing his own Kurd population with poison(read:WMD..that doesnt mean nuke only,WMD includes nuclear/chemical/bio warfare) for this reason I would suggest a northern(Kurd) Iraq as a separate entity.
But should be interesting to try out, with no railroads in Afghan except one line going to the capital btw
Ron

 

[ashep5000]

Maybe I'll try this scenario out

vote republican

 

[Ssharifi]

afghanistan is way wrong but u said u'd fix it so ok. You shouldn't give the US Jordan, or Israel or any other country. Is it posible to give the US a spawn point or w/e that lets them build units for free, and then you get to invade countries without the threat of being taken over...
btw, since every1 else is sayin something about iraqi or middle eastern terrorists, no ones said anything about us supported terrorists in central and south america

 

[bombshoo]

Diffrent kind of terrorist...Not to say they are any better, but in truth, alot of our money indirectly ends up supporting the ones down there. I think its established this scenario needs some work.