I agree...or perhaps Green Berets? Or (and this may be considered radical), since the Americans are the only country with Stealth Bombers/Fighters, why not make that their UU? Why should the Mongols, Chinese, Koreans, French, English, etc.,etc., etc., get to have stealth planes when currently only one country has them?
Could other countries have them? Possibly, but if they were smart they'd announce it to the rest of the world, sort of a "don't mess with us" warning. And I'm sure if China or North Korea etc, had them, they'd have shown them off to the world long ago, to prove how "mighty" communists can be.
Would having stealth only for America unbalance the game? Possibly, but that's another debate. I think that it's a better UU than an F-15, which is about 5-10 years from decommision anyways. They are being replaced by the F-22 Raptor.
For me the worst unit has to be the Keshik. It's just so underpowered and I was so disappointed - the Mongols really deserved better than a blah blah knight-style unit which is no better than a War Elephant.
But I LOVE the new Mongol units posted on this site. Especially the ones that can bombard! I can't wait to try them out.
The worst UU is hands down, "The Celtic Swordsman".
Great uits to have, but by the time you build a few your in feudalism and 'no more UU's'. Automaticly you build MI like everyone else. And the few you've built can be upgraded to MI.
I'd rather they not be upgradeable.
HA Ha ha he he ho hee he... The producers have something against korea I see.
RE: a new unit for America. "Gunslingers" c'mon, the worlds most famous weapon makers established 100 year histories then. Smith and wesson? Colt? Dillenger? The list goes on.
BTW. the partroopers and chariots suck. Not UU's but they still suck.
I picked F-15 for the same reasons everyone else who did, did. The American UU should be an upgraded Modern Infantry, either with either airdrop capabilities (reflecting the overall increased mobility of American land power) or better defense and speed ratings.
It never ceases to amaze me how people from the states think their UU should be an Infantry/Marine type unit...
The UK has by far the most highly trained and highly skilled Infantry units and Marines. If the USA gets a Marine with +1 attack we need one with +3!!!
Wow - sorry for the rant, you you were the proverbial straw.
Edit: Welcome to CFC by the way! I promise not to be such an ass next time I respond to one of your posts...
Man'o war, for me. anyway. I don't build naval units early in the game(except when I need to scout and transfering setllers to an island or continent). Also, until I can build submarines(because of their radar ability) or even better, battleships and AEGIS cruiser, I don't like naval units.
I think Hwacha. (as I'm informed all this 3 UU are improve in C3C, and thats nice, specialy M-o-War). I'm also bored with all those UU that come insted of Knight (except of course Samurai and War Elephant, they are truly Great!)
F-15. Too late to trigger a meaningful GA, and no better than the Jet Fighter at what it's supposed to do. The Man'O'War at least represents a clear advantage over regular Frigates, and is decently timed GA-wise.
The Hwach'a is actually a good unit. If it's indeed got lethal bombard i C3C, it's easily among the best in the game.
We've rehashed the War Chariot questions too many times already. I'm still not going to take anyone who disses it seriously.
I'm very hard pressed to see the point of the Conquistador as unit, but the GA timing is nice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.