Tile Auction: -16,-2

[BCLG100]

no i am not proposing that but he has to stick by the rules that is what they are there for every single one of these posters know the rules and are only doing it to annoy everyone but seeing how its already been a day since the last bid i believe that donsig wins

 

[Plexus]

I officially declare donsig the winner.

 

[gonzo_for_civ]

no i am not proposing that but he has to stick by the rules that is what they are there for every single one of these posters know the rules and are only doing it to annoy everyone but seeing how its already been a day since the last bid i believe that donsig wins

My goodness....a period or two so I can breathe please

And the fact that you aren't proposing it doesn't change this statement by me:

You aren't going to win by raising it by 1 gold anyways and it's just needlessly prolonging this process.

There we go. I feel that he can change that rule since it can not change the final outcome, people will still only pay what they are willing. You could argue it could make someone pay an extra 24, but that's a moot point, considering they'd just get outbid by one again if it was allowed.

 

[donsig]

Thank you Plexus! Please post the appropriate transactions in the revenue and land office threads!

 

[BCLG100]

i understand what your are saying but unless the auctioneer states a certain price bid then anyone can bid however much they want for it the certain posters that did it weren doing it to be annoing which some people will have seen and wont think as higley of them praps

 

[Plexus]

Does it really matter, BCLG? Just go with the flow...

 

[BCLG100]

well yeh its over now but next time if you want specific increments include them in your first post