Traits and unique units tied to leaders?!

[Poseidon_55]

Montezuma was an embracment to the aztec people the real leader of the aztecs at that time who rebeled agianst cortez was his nephew gultemo or something like that can't spell

 

[Vietcong]

agreede, tho i dont think he was the ofical leader.. the only resion thay cose montazuma *sp* is cus hes the most widely known leader of the azteks.

 

[SuperBeaverInc.]

Montezuma II(which I assume is the one they used in Civ) was the leader of the Aztecs at the arrival of the Spanish.

 

[ComradeDavo]

I think this is an awesome idea! I really hope they do this...

I agree, it looks like civ4 is going to be so much more diverse than civ3

 

[Poseidon_55]

he was the leader who did nothing he let the spainish walts that is why his people killed him

 

[OLX]

Anyone thought of Cuahatemoc as the Aztec Leader?

 

[JavalTigar]

"For example, if you play aggressively with Gandhi, he might get angry. They key is playing by their styles. Traits also depend on leaders, rather than Civilizations. Each leader will have unique traits and bonuses Ideological conflicts are a definite possibility as a result of the AI leader personalities and their ties to certain religions or civics." -pre-release info

Each leader has certain traits that give certain bonuses-FINE

What scares me is if you play Ghandi as a militant expansionist, He will get mad at you! The player is supposed to be the Leader. How can I be upset with myself!

Or did I mis-read something?

 

[SuperBeaverInc.]

"For example, if you play aggressively with Gandhi, he might get angry. They key is playing by their styles. Traits also depend on leaders, rather than Civilizations. Each leader will have unique traits and bonuses Ideological conflicts are a definite possibility as a result of the AI leader personalities and their ties to certain religions or civics." -pre-release info

Each leader has certain traits that give certain bonuses-FINE

What scares me is if you play Ghandi as a militant expansionist, He will get mad at you! The player is supposed to be the Leader. How can I be upset with myself!

Or did I mis-read something?

The thing that confuses me about that quote is the "if you play aggressively with Gandhi, he might get angry". If you are playing with him, then in Civ III terms, you are playing as Gandhi. In that way, he would be getting mad at himself.

 

[Poseidon_55]

The M-4 Sherman was a horrible tank so that shouldn't be the american UU

 

[Vietcong]

yea it realy was!!
it had an underpowered gun, and thin armor!
the only atvantage it had was its reliability, and its ease to produce.

if FDR was to have a uu i whold go for something like a GI, B17/ B29, P51/P38, or for another land unit, maby a specal screaming egal or something?
but the only way the m4 chold win in battle was to out number the enamy tank, witch wasnt to hard for a sherman to do. but comon.

lets say the m4 sherman was in the game..
regurler tank
110 hammers
18 strength

m4
70 hammers
15 or 14 strength...

 

[Poseidon_55]

The US had no amazing stuff in WW2 except the B-29 they were really know for their mass production

 

[GoodGame]

UU's with CIVs would be cool, especially if they raise the number of leaders per civ well over a measley 2.

Rather than do the detailed research, then:

England---longbow, Man-o-war, Redcoat, SAS commando

USA----minuteman, cavalry (rough rider?), M4 Sherman/Liberty Ship (transport), F15, Delta Force.

Germany---(mental blank)---Panzer IV / King Tiger---Leopard2

Russia----Golden Horde (horseman vassal for the Hun), Cossack, T34 tank, MiG (pick one), T80/T90 tank.